Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Comms

aiqbench analysis

This research establishes that the advantage of GHZ-based conference key agreement over pairwise BB84 is governed by the specific composition of Pauli errors rather than the noise channel type itself. The study provides a closed-form rate for arbitrary per-party noise, proving that distributing a fixed noise budget across all network arms yields superior performance compared to concentrating it on a single link. These findings offer critical design principles for optimizing multipartite quantum key distribution networks against realistic decoherence effects.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Pauli Error Composition Determines the Multipartite Advantage in Conference Key Agreement

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.07251v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: GHZ-based conference key agreement distributes a shared key to $N$ parties in one network use, whereas pairwise BB84 needs $N-1$. The survival of that advantage has been studied against party number, loss, and topology, but almost always with the channel fixed at depolarizing. Simulating both protocols exactly for $N = 3, 4, 5$ under dephasing, amplitude damping, and depolarizing noise, we find the crossover is set by the channel's Pauli error composition, not its identity: normalized to average infidelity, amplitude damping and depolarizing agree to within about 1\% at each group size, while dephasing can tolerate roughly $2.4\times$ more at $N = 3$. We derive a closed-form rate for arbitrary per-party Pauli noise and use it to prove that concentrating a fixed noise budget on one arm is strictly worse than spreading it, and that giving the dealer role to the cleanest arm improves the rate by roughly 18\%. One structural fact drives every result: the phase-error term is a product over all $N$ arms, while the bit-error term stays local to a pair.

Abstract:GHZ-based conference key agreement distributes a shared key to $N$ parties in one network use, whereas pairwise BB84 needs $N-1$. The survival of that advantage has been studied against party number, loss, and topology, but almost always with the channel fixed at depolarizing. Simulating both protocols exactly for $N = 3, 4, 5$ under dephasing, amplitude damping, and depolarizing noise, we find the crossover is set by the channel's Pauli error composition, not its identity: normalized to average infidelity, amplitude damping and depolarizing agree to within about 1\% at each group size, while dephasing can tolerate roughly $2.4\times$ more at $N = 3$. We derive a closed-form rate for arbitrary per-party Pauli noise and use it to prove that concentrating a fixed noise budget on one arm is strictly worse than spreading it, and that giving the dealer role to the cleanest arm improves the rate by roughly 18\%. One structural fact drives every result: the phase-error term is a product over all $N$ arms, while the bit-error term stays local to a pair.

Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Networking and Internet Architecture (cs.NI)

C.5.0; E.3; C.2.2

arXiv:2610.07251 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2610.07251v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.07251 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 280 words

Related coverage