aiqbench analysis
This study introduces new Greek-language benchmarks derived from national entrance exams to rigorously evaluate Large Language Models in linguistically demanding domains. The research highlights how targeted linguistic adaptation can enable smaller models to rival larger counterparts, while simultaneously exposing the fragility of small architectures to prompt verbosity and context window overload. These findings are critical for understanding the specific constraints and optimization paths required for deploying AI effectively in low-resource languages.
Pass or Fail? Evaluating LLMs on Two Greek Examination Benchmarks
arXiv:2609.34800v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) imposes a thorough evaluation of their linguistic and analytical capabilities as well as constraints, particularly for a language with limited benchmark coverage such as Greek. To address the limited availability of comprehensive benchmarks in this domain, we introduce Prot-Ex and Pan-Ex, two benchmarks consisting of questions from entrance exams for Greek Model and Experimental schools as well as the Panhellenic exams (the Greek national university entrance examinations). These benchmarks are employed to assess the performance of text-only LLMs-including the Greek-adapted KriKri-8B-Instruct, Llama-3.1-8B, Gemma-4-26B, and Qwen-3-32B-across diverse academic disciplines (Modern Greek, Mathematics, Physics, etc.) and task formats (closed, structured, and open-ended), including textualized visual context (i.e., image descriptions). Our findings indicate the localized KriKri-8B significantly outperforms its base model, successfully rivalling much larger LLMs in linguistically demanding humanities tasks. By leveraging an LLM-as-a-Judge methodology, we expose the inadequacy of traditional lexical metrics for evaluating complex reasoning. Crucially, we uncover a few-shot prompting paradox: while synthetic examples improve accuracy in closed-ended questions, they severely overload the context window of 8B models in structured tasks, causing significant performance degradation. Ultimately, this study suggests targeted linguistic adaptation offsets lower parameter counts in specialized domains, despite the fragility of smaller models to prompt verbosity.
Title:Pass or Fail? Evaluating LLMs on Two Greek Examination Benchmarks
Abstract:The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) imposes a thorough evaluation of their linguistic and analytical capabilities as well as constraints, particularly for a language with limited benchmark coverage such as Greek. To address the limited availability of comprehensive benchmarks in this domain, we introduce Prot-Ex and Pan-Ex, two benchmarks consisting of questions from entrance exams for Greek Model and Experimental schools as well as the Panhellenic exams (the Greek national university entrance examinations). These benchmarks are employed to assess the performance of text-only LLMs-including the Greek-adapted KriKri-8B-Instruct, Llama-3.1-8B, Gemma-4-26B, and Qwen-3-32B-across diverse academic disciplines (Modern Greek, Mathematics, Physics, etc.) and task formats (closed, structured, and open-ended), including textualized visual context (i.e., image descriptions). Our findings indicate the localized KriKri-8B significantly outperforms its base model, successfully rivalling much larger LLMs in linguistically demanding humanities tasks. By leveraging an LLM-as-a-Judge methodology, we expose the inadequacy of traditional lexical metrics for evaluating complex reasoning. Crucially, we uncover a few-shot prompting paradox: while synthetic examples improve accuracy in closed-ended questions, they severely overload the context window of 8B models in structured tasks, causing significant performance degradation. Ultimately, this study suggests targeted linguistic adaptation offsets lower parameter counts in specialized domains, despite the fragility of smaller models to prompt verbosity.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.34800 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.34800v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.34800 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 312 words
Related coverage

An unexamined cause of the OpenAI Hugging Face hacking incident: its binary performance metric
LessWrong · Sep 23, 2026

Reviewing failure modes in science as we prepare for AI researchers
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026

GPT-5.4 Repairs 48.8% of Qiskit Bugs Across Six Versions
Quantum Zeitgeist · Jul 14, 2026
If This Were a Test, How Much Would It Cost?
LessWrong · Jun 16, 2026