Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research addresses a critical gap in graph analytics by developing methods to estimate total edge counts in sparse networks when the sampling rate is unknown, a common issue in web crawls and data panels. By reducing the problem to tail-index estimation under a sparse exchangeable model, the approach significantly outperforms standard quadratic estimators that assume full observability. The modular nature of this solution allows for accurate reconstruction of degree distributions without requiring extensive parameter fitting, offering practical utility for analyzing incomplete graph datasets.
Sources coveringarXiv, LessWrong, Quantum Zeitgeist, Snorkel AI Blog
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Partially Observed Sparse Graphs: The Unknown Sampling Rate is a Tail Index

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2609.26199v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A large graph is often available only in part: a crawl stopped by its budget, a panel, a partial dump. When the sampled fraction $s$ is known by design the total edge count follows from $\hat e=e_s/s^2$ and no model is needed. We treat the case where $s$ is unknown and the population size is known. Our main result is a reduction: under a sparse exchangeable (graphex) model the expected non-isolated fraction obeys $n_s/n_1\to s^{1+\sigma}$, so the sampling rate becomes estimable once the tail index $\sigma$ is, and substituting it back gives $e_s(n_1/n_s)^{2/(1+\sigma)}$ -- the same estimator, with the design quantity inferred. Estimating global edge cardinality in a sparse graph is therefore, in expectation, tail-index estimation, and the quadratic graphon estimator is the case $\sigma=0$: it fails by an identity rather than by a fit ($260\%$ median error against $27\%$). We bound the finite-size error of the substitution and show the reduction is \emph{modular} in the tail-index estimator --- filled with a published closed-form one it reaches $21.7\%$ over $13$ networks and $39$ sampling budgets with no fitting at all. Fitting a full graphex additionally returns the degree distribution at any size and a generative object, in a representation where sparsity is a coordinate and the interpolation path is dictated rather than chosen. Two limits are exact: rank-one graphexes have transitivity fixed by the degree profile, so high-clustering graphs lie outside the class; and under snowball or random-walk crawls every method here fails, the design-based oracle worst of all ($7.8\%$ to $588\%$).

Abstract:A large graph is often available only in part: a crawl stopped by its budget, a panel, a partial dump. When the sampled fraction $s$ is known by design the total edge count follows from $\hat e=e_s/s^2$ and no model is needed. We treat the case where $s$ is unknown and the population size is known. Our main result is a reduction: under a sparse exchangeable (graphex) model the expected non-isolated fraction obeys $n_s/n_1\to s^{1+\sigma}$, so the sampling rate becomes estimable once the tail index $\sigma$ is, and substituting it back gives $e_s(n_1/n_s)^{2/(1+\sigma)}$ -- the same estimator, with the design quantity inferred. Estimating global edge cardinality in a sparse graph is therefore, in expectation, tail-index estimation, and the quadratic graphon estimator is the case $\sigma=0$: it fails by an identity rather than by a fit ($260\%$ median error against $27\%$). We bound the finite-size error of the substitution and show the reduction is \emph{modular} in the tail-index estimator --- filled with a published closed-form one it reaches $21.7\%$ over $13$ networks and $39$ sampling budgets with no fitting at all. Fitting a full graphex additionally returns the degree distribution at any size and a generative object, in a representation where sparsity is a coordinate and the interpolation path is dictated rather than chosen. Two limits are exact: rank-one graphexes have transitivity fixed by the degree profile, so high-clustering graphs lie outside the class; and under snowball or random-walk crawls every method here fails, the design-based oracle worst of all ($7.8\%$ to $588\%$).

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2609.26199 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.26199v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.26199 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 346 words

Related coverage