Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

ParaRecover introduces a critical new benchmark focusing on error localization and recovery within parallel tool-use agents, addressing the gap where current evaluations only measure final task success rather than intermediate failure handling. By utilizing a fine-grained taxonomy of 14 error types and an SDE rubric, this work provides essential data for improving the diagnostic reasoning and reflective capabilities of large language models in complex, multi-turn scenarios.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

ParaRecover: A Process-Level Benchmark for Error Localization and Recovery in Parallel Tool-Use Agents

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.12345v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Existing agent benchmarks mainly evaluate final task success or tool-call correctness, providing limited insight into whether agents can reliably diagnose and recover from intermediate execution failures. This limitation becomes particularly critical in multi-turn parallel tool-use scenarios, where errors may propagate across dependent branches and trigger cascading failures. We introduce ParaRecover, a process-level benchmark for evaluating error localization and recovery in multi-turn parallel tool-use agents. Built upon a fine-grained taxonomy of 14 error types covering planning dependencies, tool selection, and argument matching, the benchmark comprises 10,626 instances spanning two difficulty levels. To enable finegrained, process-oriented evaluation, we further propose the SDE rubric, which measures structural integrity, diagnostic reasoning, and evolutionary strategy during agent execution.Experiments across more than ten mainstream LLMs reveal that even state-of-the-art models still struggle with multi-turn error propagation,implicit tool-use failures, and precise replanning. Moreover, we demonstrate that the SDE rubric provides effective supervision signals for improving agents' reflective recovery capabilities. Our data and code are available at https://github.com/gbw206/ParaRecover.

Abstract:Existing agent benchmarks mainly evaluate final task success or tool-call correctness, providing limited insight into whether agents can reliably diagnose and recover from intermediate execution failures. This limitation becomes particularly critical in multi-turn parallel tool-use scenarios, where errors may propagate across dependent branches and trigger cascading failures. We introduce ParaRecover, a process-level benchmark for evaluating error localization and recovery in multi-turn parallel tool-use agents. Built upon a fine-grained taxonomy of 14 error types covering planning dependencies, tool selection, and argument matching, the benchmark comprises 10,626 instances spanning two difficulty levels. To enable finegrained, process-oriented evaluation, we further propose the SDE rubric, which measures structural integrity, diagnostic reasoning, and evolutionary strategy during agent this http URL across more than ten mainstream LLMs reveal that even state-of-the-art models still struggle with multi-turn error propagation,implicit tool-use failures, and precise replanning. Moreover, we demonstrate that the SDE rubric provides effective supervision signals for improving agents' reflective recovery capabilities. Our data and code are available at this https URL.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Software Engineering (cs.SE)

arXiv:2609.12345 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.12345v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.12345 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 261 words

Related coverage