aiqbench analysis
This research introduces TRACE, a fine-tuning framework designed to resolve conflicts between external retrieved knowledge and internal parametric memory in Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems. By leveraging multi-agent debate traces and answer completeness regularization, the method enhances model robustness against misleading context while preventing premature response termination. The approach offers a significant step forward in ensuring factual reliability for LLMs operating with dynamic external data sources.
Parameters vs. Context: TRACE Fine-Tuning for Robust Retrieval-Augmented Generation
arXiv:2609.30337v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) mitigates knowledge obsolescence and factual hallucination in large language models by introducing external context. However, when retrieved knowledge conflicts with the model's internal parametric knowledge, the model may either blindly follow misleading context or incorrectly rely on parametric knowledge, leading to unreliable responses. To address this issue, this paper proposes TRACE (Debate-TRace and Answer-Completeness rEgularized fine-tuning), a robust fine-tuning framework for RAG under knowledge conflicts. First, we propose a fine-tuning method that leverages multi-agent debate traces to extract correct candidates, incorrect candidates, and answer-shift patterns, providing fine-grained supervision for reliable knowledge-source selection. In addition, we design an answer completeness regularization mechanism to alleviate empty, overly short, and prematurely terminated responses via answer-tail token reinforcement and premature termination suppression. The fine-tuning objective combines correct-answer supervision, incorrect-candidate suppression, answer-tail token reinforcement, and premature termination suppression, enabling the model to use reliable external context, resist misleading or irrelevant retrieved content, and fall back to parametric knowledge when retrieved evidence is unreliable. Experiments across multiple knowledge-conflict scenarios and datasets show that TRACE improves robustness against misleading retrieved knowledge and reduces incomplete answers. These results demonstrate that multi-agent debate traces and answer completeness regularization jointly enhance knowledge-source selection, conflict robustness, and answer quality in RAG models. Our code is available at https://github.com/PHD-lanyu/TRACE.
Title:Parameters vs. Context: TRACE Fine-Tuning for Robust Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Abstract:Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) mitigates knowledge obsolescence and factual hallucination in large language models by introducing external context. However, when retrieved knowledge conflicts with the model's internal parametric knowledge, the model may either blindly follow misleading context or incorrectly rely on parametric knowledge, leading to unreliable responses. To address this issue, this paper proposes TRACE (Debate-TRace and Answer-Completeness rEgularized fine-tuning), a robust fine-tuning framework for RAG under knowledge conflicts. First, we propose a fine-tuning method that leverages multi-agent debate traces to extract correct candidates, incorrect candidates, and answer-shift patterns, providing fine-grained supervision for reliable knowledge-source selection. In addition, we design an answer completeness regularization mechanism to alleviate empty, overly short, and prematurely terminated responses via answer-tail token reinforcement and premature termination suppression. The fine-tuning objective combines correct-answer supervision, incorrect-candidate suppression, answer-tail token reinforcement, and premature termination suppression, enabling the model to use reliable external context, resist misleading or irrelevant retrieved content, and fall back to parametric knowledge when retrieved evidence is unreliable. Experiments across multiple knowledge-conflict scenarios and datasets show that TRACE improves robustness against misleading retrieved knowledge and reduces incomplete answers. These results demonstrate that multi-agent debate traces and answer completeness regularization jointly enhance knowledge-source selection, conflict robustness, and answer quality in RAG models. Our code is available at this https URL.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.30337 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.30337v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.30337 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 313 words
Related coverage

NVIDIA GTC Taipei at COMPUTEX: Live Updates on What’s Next in AI
NVIDIA · May 21, 2026

Exploring self-distilled reasoning for supervised fine-tuning with Amazon Nova
AWS · Jul 21, 2026
Retrieval-Augmented LLM Agents: Learning to Learn from Experience
arXiv · Sep 1, 2026

[AINews] Hot Chips: OpenAI’s Jalapeño, Cerebras CS-5, Groq 3 LPX, Apple M6
Latent Space · Aug 27, 2026