Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research establishes a fundamental link between parameter symmetries and representational geometry in overparameterized neural networks, clarifying when internal representations reliably reflect computational function. By decomposing geometry into essential and auxiliary components, the study provides a rigorous framework for interpreting features despite the degeneracy introduced by network size. These findings are critical for advancing theoretical understanding of deep learning interpretability and the limits of inference from activation patterns.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Parameter symmetries determine representational geometry in overparameterized nonlinear networks

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.39078v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Representations are routinely used across machine learning, psychology, and neuroscience to draw inferences about the computations of biological and artificial systems. Such inferences presume a meaningful link between representational geometry and the computation being performed. For artificial neural networks, however, the extent to which function constrains representation remains unclear. One key obstacle is that these networks admit parameter symmetries: changes in parameterization that preserve function exactly while reshaping representational geometry. Here, we show that a broad class of parameter symmetries acts on representations through just three primitive feature transformations: addition, duplication, and scaling. This feature-level characterization yields a closed-form decomposition of representational geometry into essential and auxiliary components, which makes precise how degeneracy in representational geometry can grow with overparameterization even when function is held fixed. Finally, we show that implementation-level selection rules can resolve this degeneracy, yielding identifiable geometries in which features are weighted according to their contributions to the network's function. Together, our results delineate when representations can support inferences about computation, and when they cannot.

Abstract:Representations are routinely used across machine learning, psychology, and neuroscience to draw inferences about the computations of biological and artificial systems. Such inferences presume a meaningful link between representational geometry and the computation being performed. For artificial neural networks, however, the extent to which function constrains representation remains unclear. One key obstacle is that these networks admit parameter symmetries: changes in parameterization that preserve function exactly while reshaping representational geometry. Here, we show that a broad class of parameter symmetries acts on representations through just three primitive feature transformations: addition, duplication, and scaling. This feature-level characterization yields a closed-form decomposition of representational geometry into essential and auxiliary components, which makes precise how degeneracy in representational geometry can grow with overparameterization even when function is held fixed. Finally, we show that implementation-level selection rules can resolve this degeneracy, yielding identifiable geometries in which features are weighted according to their contributions to the network's function. Together, our results delineate when representations can support inferences about computation, and when they cannot.

To appear in NeurIPS 2026. 89 pages, 9 figures. Code: this https URL

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2609.39078 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.39078v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.39078 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 275 words

Related coverage