aiqbench analysis
This research addresses a critical bottleneck in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) known as advantage collapse, which hampers model performance on difficult reasoning tasks. By alternating continuous policy updates with discrete prompt evolution, the proposed Joint Policy and Prompt Optimization framework restores necessary variance signals and significantly boosts accuracy on benchmarks like AIME24 and AIME25. The study demonstrates that unifying evolutionary algorithms with reinforcement learning offers a robust path forward for improving LLM alignment in sparse-reward environments.
P^2O: Joint Policy and Prompt Optimization
arXiv:2603.21877v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) enhances Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning but is suffer from advantage collapse: when all rollouts of a query receive identical rewards, the group variance vanishes, most damagingly on hard samples, where scaling rollout budgets yields little. We introduce Joint Policy and Prompt Optimization (P O) to mitigate this collapse by alternating continuous policy updates with discrete prompt evolution. P O mines hard samples with a success-rate threshold, evolves reasoning prompts for them with GEPA, and internalizes the elicited trajectories via context distillation, which optimizes each trajectory under the original query and thus removes inference-time prompting, with a Context Ratio Mask (CRM) filtering out extreme likelihood ratios. P O restores critical advantage signals and surpasses the GRPO baseline by up to 8.2 points in average accuracy on six held-out benchmarks across all training datasets and backbones, while also outperforming DAPO and other baselines. The gains are especially pronounced on hard benchmarks, reaching up to 16.3 points above GRPO on average across AIME24 and AIME25. Our findings expose the limits of standard exploration in sparse-reward environments, illuminating the potential of unifying evolutionary algorithms with reinforcement learning. This integration of discrete semantic search and continuous parameter updates provides a self-reinforcing framework that facilitates more effective LLM alignment.
Abstract:Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) enhances Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning but is suffer from advantage collapse: when all rollouts of a query receive identical rewards, the group variance vanishes, most damagingly on hard samples, where scaling rollout budgets yields little. We introduce Joint Policy and Prompt Optimization (P O) to mitigate this collapse by alternating continuous policy updates with discrete prompt evolution. P O mines hard samples with a success-rate threshold, evolves reasoning prompts for them with GEPA, and internalizes the elicited trajectories via context distillation, which optimizes each trajectory under the original query and thus removes inference-time prompting, with a Context Ratio Mask (CRM) filtering out extreme likelihood ratios. P O restores critical advantage signals and surpasses the GRPO baseline by up to 8.2 points in average accuracy on six held-out benchmarks across all training datasets and backbones, while also outperforming DAPO and other baselines. The gains are especially pronounced on hard benchmarks, reaching up to 16.3 points above GRPO on average across AIME24 and AIME25. Our findings expose the limits of standard exploration in sparse-reward environments, illuminating the potential of unifying evolutionary algorithms with reinforcement learning. This integration of discrete semantic search and continuous parameter updates provides a self-reinforcing framework that facilitates more effective LLM alignment.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2603.21877 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2603.21877v4 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.21877 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 305 words
Related coverage
Privacy-Preserving Prompted Policy Search for Robotic Control
arXiv · Sep 28, 2026
TailSieve: Partial-Rollout-Guided Tail Routing for LLM Rollouts
arXiv · Aug 25, 2026

Evaluating task vectors, unlearning and inoculation
LessWrong · Sep 20, 2026

When Partial Credit Opposes Completion
Snorkel AI Blog · Oct 15, 2026