aiqbench analysis
This research addresses output logit divergence in large language model pretraining by targeting the geometric anisotropy of output embeddings rather than just mitigating symptoms. The proposed Output Embedding Centering (OEC) strategy, available as either a deterministic operation or a regularization loss, demonstrates superior training stability compared to existing methods like z-loss. Additionally, the $\mu$-loss variant offers reduced sensitivity to hyperparameter tuning, providing a more robust solution for scaling model pretraining.
Output Embedding Centering for Stable LLM Pretraining
arXiv:2601.02031v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Pretraining of large language models is not only expensive but also prone to certain training instabilities. A specific instability that often occurs at the end of training is output logit divergence. The most widely used mitigation strategies, z-loss and logit soft-capping, merely address the symptoms rather than the underlying cause of the problem. In this paper, we analyze the instability from the perspective of the output embeddings' geometry and identify anisotropic embeddings as its source. Based on this, we propose output embedding centering (OEC) as a new mitigation strategy, and demonstrate that it suppresses output logit divergence. OEC can be implemented in two different ways: as a deterministic operation called $\mu$-centering, or a regularization method called $\mu$-loss. Our experiments show that both variants outperform z-loss in terms of training stability, while being on par with logit soft-capping. This holds true both in the presence and the absence of weight tying. As a secondary result, we find that $\mu$-loss is significantly less sensitive to regularization hyperparameter tuning than z-loss.
Abstract:Pretraining of large language models is not only expensive but also prone to certain training instabilities. A specific instability that often occurs at the end of training is output logit divergence. The most widely used mitigation strategies, z-loss and logit soft-capping, merely address the symptoms rather than the underlying cause of the problem. In this paper, we analyze the instability from the perspective of the output embeddings' geometry and identify anisotropic embeddings as its source. Based on this, we propose output embedding centering (OEC) as a new mitigation strategy, and demonstrate that it suppresses output logit divergence. OEC can be implemented in two different ways: as a deterministic operation called $\mu$-centering, or a regularization method called $\mu$-loss. Our experiments show that both variants outperform z-loss in terms of training stability, while being on par with logit soft-capping. This holds true both in the presence and the absence of weight tying. As a secondary result, we find that $\mu$-loss is significantly less sensitive to regularization hyperparameter tuning than z-loss.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2601.02031 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2601.02031v3 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.02031 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 267 words
Related coverage

Reflections on unlearning and inoculation
LessWrong · Sep 20, 2026

Challenge: Hand coding weights for efficient sequence memorisation
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 23, 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · Jul 31, 2026
Does preservation make sense before we know how to revive?
LessWrong · Jun 15, 2026