ORDERS: An Empirical Study of Norm-Rank Aggregation for Personalized Federated Learning

arXiv:2610.10361v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Personalized federated learning combines shared representations with client-specific predictors, but the contribution of a server weighting rule can be obscured by local training and evaluation choices. We study ORDERS, a configuration that combines a shared backbone, a private residual adapter and classifier, geometric weights assigned by descending update norm, feature alignment, and private-parameter perturbations. The server computes a weighted sum of updates obtained from the same broadcast model; it does not obtain an additional optimization effect from sequential addition. A fully specified evaluation comprises 80 final runs: eight configurations, two datasets, and five training seeds on one fixed partition per dataset. On two-class-per-client CIFAR-10, ORDERS achieves $80.51 \pm 0.79\%$ native mean client accuracy, compared with $79.02 \pm 1.42\%$ for FedPer-R1 and $80.27 \pm 0.73\%$ for the matched uniform-weight control. After common local fine-tuning, the difference from FedPer-R1 narrows to 0.32 percentage points. On Sent140, ORDERS reaches $74.71 \pm 0.49\%$, only 0.69 points above a post hoc client training-majority diagnostic. Ablations provide limited, endpoint-dependent evidence for norm ranking and alignment, and no clear benefit from perturbations. Parameter-payload savings are 5.47% and 0.78%, respectively.

Abstract:Personalized federated learning combines shared representations with client-specific predictors, but the contribution of a server weighting rule can be obscured by local training and evaluation choices. We study ORDERS, a configuration that combines a shared backbone, a private residual adapter and classifier, geometric weights assigned by descending update norm, feature alignment, and private-parameter perturbations. The server computes a weighted sum of updates obtained from the same broadcast model; it does not obtain an additional optimization effect from sequential addition. A fully specified evaluation comprises 80 final runs: eight configurations, two datasets, and five training seeds on one fixed partition per dataset. On two-class-per-client CIFAR-10, ORDERS achieves $80.51 \pm 0.79\%$ native mean client accuracy, compared with $79.02 \pm 1.42\%$ for FedPer-R1 and $80.27 \pm 0.73\%$ for the matched uniform-weight control. After common local fine-tuning, the difference from FedPer-R1 narrows to 0.32 percentage points. On Sent140, ORDERS reaches $74.71 \pm 0.49\%$, only 0.69 points above a post hoc client training-majority diagnostic. Ablations provide limited, endpoint-dependent evidence for norm ranking and alignment, and no clear benefit from perturbations. Parameter-payload savings are 5.47% and 0.78%, respectively.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.10361 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.10361v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.10361 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

aiqbench analysis

ORDERS: An Empirical Study of Norm-Rank Aggregation for Personalized Federated Learning

Related coverage