Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI & Society

aiqbench analysis

This research applies ordered network analysis to map the persistence and transition patterns of epistemic emotions like curiosity, confusion, and frustration during human collaboration. The study highlights how these affective states form a stable core that shifts based on group speed and reporting methods, offering critical insights for designing AI systems that effectively support co-situated problem solving. By clarifying the dynamics between emotional states such as conflict and disengagement, this work provides a foundational framework for building more empathetic collaborative intelligence tools.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Ordered Network Analysis of Epistemic Emotions during Collaborative Problem Solving

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2607.23317v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Investigating how affective states such as confusion and frustration persist and transition during co-situated collaborative problem solving (CPS) is important for understanding the dynamics of epistemic emotions. However, the accurate identification of affective states remain challenging as there is no gold-standard truth in this space. Here, we analyze affective states collected through retrospective cued-recall during an in-person CPS task. Using ordered network analysis (ONA), we examine (1) the overall ordered structure of affective states and how this structure differs across self-caught and probe-caught reporting methods, and (2) what aspects of this ordered structure are emphasized differently in slower and faster groups. We find that ONA reveals differences in persistence and transition patterns that are not apparent from descriptive summaries alone. In particular, we observe a stable epistemic core linking curiosity, optimism, and confusion, with different reporting methods emphasizing different connections among states. An analysis between faster and slower groups show that roles of confusion and disengagement also shift significantly during collaboration, particularly in their relationship to conflict. We interpret our findings in the context of collaboration and discuss their implications in developing AI systems that support CPS.

Abstract:Investigating how affective states such as confusion and frustration persist and transition during co-situated collaborative problem solving (CPS) is important for understanding the dynamics of epistemic emotions. However, the accurate identification of affective states remain challenging as there is no gold-standard truth in this space. Here, we analyze affective states collected through retrospective cued-recall during an in-person CPS task. Using ordered network analysis (ONA), we examine (1) the overall ordered structure of affective states and how this structure differs across self-caught and probe-caught reporting methods, and (2) what aspects of this ordered structure are emphasized differently in slower and faster groups. We find that ONA reveals differences in persistence and transition patterns that are not apparent from descriptive summaries alone. In particular, we observe a stable epistemic core linking curiosity, optimism, and confusion, with different reporting methods emphasizing different connections among states. An analysis between faster and slower groups show that roles of confusion and disengagement also shift significantly during collaboration, particularly in their relationship to conflict. We interpret our findings in the context of collaboration and discuss their implications in developing AI systems that support CPS.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY)

arXiv:2607.23317 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2607.23317v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.23317 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

In Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2026. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 16584. Springer, Cham

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-29763-1_20 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 311 words

Related coverage