aiqbench analysis
This study introduces ORBIT-FMIB, a diagnostic framework designed to evaluate how protein foundation models like ESM-2 retain higher-order epistatic information across their representation hierarchies. Initial results suggesting a loss of such information were found to be unstable upon independent replication with matched hardware and seeds, indicating that the question of selective information retention remains open rather than resolved. The work underscores the necessity for rigorous reproducibility checks before treating diagnostic outputs from biological foundation models as definitive findings.
ORBIT-FMIB: Tracking Order-Resolved Epistatic Information Through ESM-2
arXiv:2610.00672v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Protein foundation models support mutation-effect and structural prediction, but predictive performance alone does not reveal which forms of biological interaction information remain accessible through model depth. We ask whether ESM-2 retains higher-order epistatic information as strongly as first- and second-order information across its representation hierarchy, introducing ORBIT-FMIB, a diagnostic framework combining Walsh-based interaction decomposition with subset-conditioned neural dependence estimation. The method is validated on synthetic landscapes with known interaction structure before being applied to the dense four-site GB1 fitness landscape using frozen ESM-2 representations. An initial production run suggested ESM-2 retains higher-order epistatic information less well than lower-order information ($\Delta_{\mathrm{HO-LO}}=-0.107$). An independent replication of the complete measurement grid, under matched GPU hardware and identical critic seeds, substantially reduced this contrast ($\Delta_{\mathrm{HO-LO}}=-0.017$), and its sign was unstable across otherwise-defensible evaluation-pairing choices applied to the same trained critics ($-0.011$ to $+0.015$). We therefore do not currently have robust evidence that ESM-2 selectively loses higher-order epistatic information, nor that retention is equal across orders; the directional question remains open. The measurement protocol itself, including its documented removal of a positional-subset shortcut in pooled critics, remains validated and is unaffected by this finding. ORBIT-FMIB is offered as a diagnostic framework for probing interaction structure in protein foundation models; this study's own replication result illustrates why such probing requires adequately-powered reproducibility checks before its output is treated as a biological finding.
Abstract:Protein foundation models support mutation-effect and structural prediction, but predictive performance alone does not reveal which forms of biological interaction information remain accessible through model depth. We ask whether ESM-2 retains higher-order epistatic information as strongly as first- and second-order information across its representation hierarchy, introducing ORBIT-FMIB, a diagnostic framework combining Walsh-based interaction decomposition with subset-conditioned neural dependence estimation. The method is validated on synthetic landscapes with known interaction structure before being applied to the dense four-site GB1 fitness landscape using frozen ESM-2 representations. An initial production run suggested ESM-2 retains higher-order epistatic information less well than lower-order information ($\Delta_{\mathrm{HO-LO}}=-0.107$). An independent replication of the complete measurement grid, under matched GPU hardware and identical critic seeds, substantially reduced this contrast ($\Delta_{\mathrm{HO-LO}}=-0.017$), and its sign was unstable across otherwise-defensible evaluation-pairing choices applied to the same trained critics ($-0.011$ to $+0.015$). We therefore do not currently have robust evidence that ESM-2 selectively loses higher-order epistatic information, nor that retention is equal across orders; the directional question remains open. The measurement protocol itself, including its documented removal of a positional-subset shortcut in pooled critics, remains validated and is unaffected by this finding. ORBIT-FMIB is offered as a diagnostic framework for probing interaction structure in protein foundation models; this study's own replication result illustrates why such probing requires adequately-powered reproducibility checks before its output is treated as a biological finding.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM)
arXiv:2610.00672 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.00672v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.00672 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 323 words
Related coverage
Problems of Proliferation
LessWrong · Sep 29, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026

Periodic Orbits Track Quantum States in Integrable Spin Chains
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 14, 2026

MIT Physicists Use First-Principles AI to Resolve Non-Abelian Anyon Order at Strong Landau Level Mixing
Quantum Computing Report · Oct 17, 2026