aiqbench analysis
This study applies differentiable atmospheric modeling and machine learning optimization to design effective strategies for solar geoengineering interventions. By training on a chaotic climate model, the approach successfully restores land temperatures and precipitation patterns with high efficiency, demonstrating robustness across multiple simulation emulators. The work highlights how advanced AI techniques can be directly leveraged to solve complex control problems in Earth system science.
Optimizing Geoengineering Interventions Using Differentiable Climate Models
arXiv:2609.12528v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The deployment of a geoengineering program to cool Earth's climate may be imminent. It is crucial that tools be developed to ensure that such a program would achieve its objectives while minimizing disruption. Here we exploit recently developed differentiable atmospheric models to demonstrate a novel geoengineering control strategy. In the differentiable primitive-equation atmospheric model JAX-GCM we impose a uniform $+4$\,K ocean warming and ask what pattern of sea-surface temperature cooling -- in five ocean-masked zonal bands of prescribed SST forcings whose amplitudes are free -- returns land near-surface air temperature closest to the model's own unwarmed climatology. This idealized set-up represents a cooling pattern that could be delivered physically either by marine cloud brightening or stratospheric aerosol injection. Gradients through chaotic dynamics decorrelate from the true sensitivity beyond the Lyapunov horizon, so we optimize greedily over segments of 8 to 14 days, following receding-horizon control. The learned strategy removes $92.3 \pm 0.4\%$ of the realized land warming across a ten-member ensemble of two-year rollouts, and a three-year run sustains it. If we use the spatial pattern of land temperature as the optimization objective, the distributions of precipitation, evaporation, and specific humidity over land are restored as well, even though they are not included in the objective function. The learned strategy from JAX-GCM replayed in the AI emulators LUCIE and NeuralGCM without re-optimization is successful, suggesting robustness. These promising results demonstrate a strategy for designing optimal climate interventions that can be applied broadly for geoengineering scenarios under consideration.
Abstract:The deployment of a geoengineering program to cool Earth's climate may be imminent. It is crucial that tools be developed to ensure that such a program would achieve its objectives while minimizing disruption. Here we exploit recently developed differentiable atmospheric models to demonstrate a novel geoengineering control strategy. In the differentiable primitive-equation atmospheric model JAX-GCM we impose a uniform $+4$\,K ocean warming and ask what pattern of sea-surface temperature cooling -- in five ocean-masked zonal bands of prescribed SST forcings whose amplitudes are free -- returns land near-surface air temperature closest to the model's own unwarmed climatology. This idealized set-up represents a cooling pattern that could be delivered physically either by marine cloud brightening or stratospheric aerosol injection. Gradients through chaotic dynamics decorrelate from the true sensitivity beyond the Lyapunov horizon, so we optimize greedily over segments of 8 to 14 days, following receding-horizon control. The learned strategy removes $92.3 \pm 0.4\%$ of the realized land warming across a ten-member ensemble of two-year rollouts, and a three-year run sustains it. If we use the spatial pattern of land temperature as the optimization objective, the distributions of precipitation, evaporation, and specific humidity over land are restored as well, even though they are not included in the objective function. The learned strategy from JAX-GCM replayed in the AI emulators LUCIE and NeuralGCM without re-optimization is successful, suggesting robustness. These promising results demonstrate a strategy for designing optimal climate interventions that can be applied broadly for geoengineering scenarios under consideration.
Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics (physics.ao-ph); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Optimization and Control (math.OC); Chaotic Dynamics (nlin.CD)
arXiv:2609.12528 [physics.ao-ph]
(or arXiv:2609.12528v1 [physics.ao-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.12528 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 353 words
Related coverage

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · Sep 17, 2026

Catalyzing scientific impact through global partnerships and open resources
Google Research · May 1, 2026
Optimal scenario design for climate emulation
arXiv · Sep 30, 2026
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026