aiqbench analysis
This research introduces a novel framework for randomized Hamiltonian simulation that optimizes sampling probabilities based on Hilbert-Schmidt norms to minimize average error, offering significant improvements over the conventional qDRIFT algorithm. By combining this approach with commuting Pauli grouping, the study achieves reduced error bounds for complex systems like the FeMoco catalyst model, demonstrating linear scaling benefits as qubit counts increase. These findings establish a practical design principle for enhancing the efficiency and accuracy of quantum algorithms used in chemistry and materials science simulations.
Optimized Randomized Hamiltonian Simulation via Average-Error Analysis
arXiv:2609.36694v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hamiltonian simulation is a central application of quantum computing. Randomized Hamiltonian simulation approximates the target dynamics by sampling quantum circuits and often allows simpler circuit implementations. We develop a framework for randomized Hamiltonian simulation in which Hamiltonian terms are sampled with arbitrary probabilities and the corresponding short-time evolutions are implemented sequentially. The leading channel error relative to ideal time evolution is governed by the variance of the sampled generators. Minimizing the variance-based upper bound on the worst-case error recovers qDRIFT, a leading randomized Hamiltonian simulation algorithm that samples terms in proportion to their operator norms. For typical input states, however, this sampling distribution need not be optimal. Minimizing Haar-averaged error bounds instead yields sampling probabilities proportional to the Hilbert-Schmidt norms of the terms. This choice can provide smaller average-error bounds than conventional qDRIFT. For Hamiltonians expressed as sums of Pauli strings, we combine this framework with commuting Pauli grouping to obtain smaller error bounds than conventional qDRIFT at fixed $R_z$ depth. Numerical benchmarks for the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model show error-bound improvement factors consistent with linear scaling in the number of qubits. For the 108-qubit FeMoco Hamiltonian, the error bounds are reduced by a factor of about 5.65. These results establish average-error optimization as a practical design principle for randomized Hamiltonian simulation.
Abstract:Hamiltonian simulation is a central application of quantum computing. Randomized Hamiltonian simulation approximates the target dynamics by sampling quantum circuits and often allows simpler circuit implementations. We develop a framework for randomized Hamiltonian simulation in which Hamiltonian terms are sampled with arbitrary probabilities and the corresponding short-time evolutions are implemented sequentially. The leading channel error relative to ideal time evolution is governed by the variance of the sampled generators. Minimizing the variance-based upper bound on the worst-case error recovers qDRIFT, a leading randomized Hamiltonian simulation algorithm that samples terms in proportion to their operator norms. For typical input states, however, this sampling distribution need not be optimal. Minimizing Haar-averaged error bounds instead yields sampling probabilities proportional to the Hilbert-Schmidt norms of the terms. This choice can provide smaller average-error bounds than conventional qDRIFT. For Hamiltonians expressed as sums of Pauli strings, we combine this framework with commuting Pauli grouping to obtain smaller error bounds than conventional qDRIFT at fixed $R_z$ depth. Numerical benchmarks for the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model show error-bound improvement factors consistent with linear scaling in the number of qubits. For the 108-qubit FeMoco Hamiltonian, the error bounds are reduced by a factor of about 5.65. These results establish average-error optimization as a practical design principle for randomized Hamiltonian simulation.
arXiv:2609.36694 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2609.36694v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.36694 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 301 words
Related coverage

A brief history of quantum vs classical computational advantage
Quantum Journal · Sep 1, 2026

Chaotic quantum system learns data with simple controls
Quantum Zeitgeist · Oct 13, 2026

Researchers Bound Errors in Quantum Simulations Using New Sampling Method
Quantum Zeitgeist · Oct 2, 2026
Error-Mitigated Hamiltonian Simulation: Complexity Analysis and Optimization for Near-Term and Early-Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computers
arXiv · Aug 7, 2026