aiqbench analysis
This research establishes a sharp theoretical tradeoff between neural network width and parameter magnitude, demonstrating how scaling these resources jointly achieves optimal statistical accuracy in regression tasks. By proving that specific activation functions can match classical minimax risk rates without logarithmic loss, the study provides a rigorous foundation for designing efficient models that balance approximation power with complexity constraints.
Optimal Tradeoffs Between Network Size and Parameter Magnitude in Neural Approximation and Minimax Regression
arXiv:2609.25710v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The statistical accuracy of neural networks depends on both their approximation power and the complexity of the class fitted from data. While increasing network size is a natural way to improve approximation, parameter magnitude provides another resource whose role must be quantified in both respects. We establish a sharp width--magnitude tradeoff at fixed depth using one elementary bounded $1$-Lipschitz Dyadic--Triangular Activation. For the unit $\beta$-H\"older ball on $[0,1]^d$ with $0<\beta\leq1$, the optimal $L^p$ approximation error for $0<p<\infty$ is of order $[N^2\log(eNT)]^{-\beta/d}$ when the network width satisfies $N\geq2d+3$ and the parameter magnitudes are bounded by $T\geq1$. Matching lower bounds hold for every fixed globally H\"older activation; its H\"older exponent affects the constants but not the rate. Under bounded design densities and independent centered sub-Gaussian noise, approximate least squares over the full clipped class at depth $23$ attains the classical H\"older minimax risk $\mathcal{O}(M^{-\frac{2\beta}{2\beta+d}})$ without logarithmic loss whenever $N^2\log(eNT)\asymp M^{\frac{d}{2\beta+d}}$, where $M$ is the sample size. This yields a continuum of statistically optimal choices, ranging from unit parameter radius to fixed network size. At fixed size, four hidden layers with at most $8d+7$ nonzero parameters give a near-optimal radius, while six layers with at most $8d+27$ attain the optimal order $\log T=\mathcal{O}(\eta^{-d/\beta})$ at approximation error $\eta$. The same decoding method also yields fixed-size Transformer approximation.
Abstract:The statistical accuracy of neural networks depends on both their approximation power and the complexity of the class fitted from data. While increasing network size is a natural way to improve approximation, parameter magnitude provides another resource whose role must be quantified in both respects. We establish a sharp width--magnitude tradeoff at fixed depth using one elementary bounded $1$-Lipschitz Dyadic--Triangular Activation. For the unit $\beta$-Hölder ball on $[0,1]^d$ with $0<\beta\leq1$, the optimal $L^p$ approximation error for $0<p<\infty$ is of order $[N^2\log(eNT)]^{-\beta/d}$ when the network width satisfies $N\geq2d+3$ and the parameter magnitudes are bounded by $T\geq1$. Matching lower bounds hold for every fixed globally Hölder activation; its Hölder exponent affects the constants but not the rate. Under bounded design densities and independent centered sub-Gaussian noise, approximate least squares over the full clipped class at depth $23$ attains the classical Hölder minimax risk $\mathcal{O}(M^{-\frac{2\beta}{2\beta+d}})$ without logarithmic loss whenever $N^2\log(eNT)\asymp M^{\frac{d}{2\beta+d}}$, where $M$ is the sample size. This yields a continuum of statistically optimal choices, ranging from unit parameter radius to fixed network size. At fixed size, four hidden layers with at most $8d+7$ nonzero parameters give a near-optimal radius, while six layers with at most $8d+27$ attain the optimal order $\log T=\mathcal{O}(\eta^{-d/\beta})$ at approximation error $\eta$. The same decoding method also yields fixed-size Transformer approximation.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.25710 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2609.25710v1 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.25710 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 310 words
Related coverage
Humans Are Not Chinchillas: Revisiting “How Quick and Big Would A Software Intelligence Explosion Be?”
LessWrong · Oct 5, 2026

Quantization and Pruning Methods to Make Your LLM Leaner
KDnuggets · Aug 28, 2026

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · Sep 17, 2026
Graph4BiLO: Graph Neural Network Approximation for Bilevel Mixed-Integer Linear Optimization
arXiv · Sep 1, 2026