aiqbench analysis
This research demonstrates that the efficiency gap between testing and learning quantum states vanishes when coherent memory is restricted, fundamentally altering resource requirements for quantum protocols. By linking these problems to the hidden shift problem and stochastic orthogonal group combinatorics, the authors establish precise sample complexity bounds that scale with available memory capacity. These findings clarify the critical role of quantum memory as a specific resource enabling efficient state verification in practical, memory-constrained quantum devices.
Optimal Stabilizer Testing and Learning with Limited Quantum Memory
arXiv:2607.02444v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We study stabilizer state testing and learning with limited coherent quantum memory. Here an algorithm sequentially receives copies of an unknown $n$-qubit state, but may keep only $k$ qubits of coherent quantum memory between measurements. With unrestricted memory, seminal work of Gross, Nezami and Walter showed how to test $n$-qubit stabilizer states using $6$ copies, which is dimension independent, unlike the learning complexity of $\Theta(n)$. We show that this testing-vs-learning separation is lost under memory constraints. More concretely we show that (1) The sample complexity of testing stabilizer states in the $k$-qubit memory framework is $\Theta(n-k)$. Our upper bound goes via a novel connection to the hidden shift problem and the lower bound is proven using a novel approach to average case bounds on likelihood ratios via combinatorics of the stochastic orthogonal group. (2) The sample complexity of learning stabilizer states with $k$ qubits of memory, in the non-adaptive framework, is $\Theta(n^2/k)$. As a further application of our techniques, we prove an exponential lower bound for purity testing even when the memory may be left coherent throughout the protocol. Our main results identify coherent quantum memory as the resource enabling the usual separation between stabilizer testing and learning. In particular, even with $k=0.99n$ qubits of memory, there is no constant-copy stabilizer tester; furthermore for $k=cn$ qubits of memory (for $0< c < 1$), stabilizer testing is as hard as learning, with both requiring $\Theta(n)$ copies.
Abstract:We study stabilizer state testing and learning with limited coherent quantum memory. Here an algorithm sequentially receives copies of an unknown $n$-qubit state, but may keep only $k$ qubits of coherent quantum memory between measurements. With unrestricted memory, seminal work of Gross, Nezami and Walter showed how to test $n$-qubit stabilizer states using $6$ copies, which is dimension independent, unlike the learning complexity of $\Theta(n)$. We show that this testing-vs-learning separation is lost under memory constraints. More concretely we show that (1) The sample complexity of testing stabilizer states in the $k$-qubit memory framework is $\Theta(n-k)$. Our upper bound goes via a novel connection to the hidden shift problem and the lower bound is proven using a novel approach to average case bounds on likelihood ratios via combinatorics of the stochastic orthogonal group. (2) The sample complexity of learning stabilizer states with $k$ qubits of memory, in the non-adaptive framework, is $\Theta(n^2/k)$. As a further application of our techniques, we prove an exponential lower bound for purity testing even when the memory may be left coherent throughout the protocol. Our main results identify coherent quantum memory as the resource enabling the usual separation between stabilizer testing and learning. In particular, even with $k=0.99n$ qubits of memory, there is no constant-copy stabilizer tester; furthermore for $k=cn$ qubits of memory (for $0< c < 1$), stabilizer testing is as hard as learning, with both requiring $\Theta(n)$ copies.
67 pages, 5 figures. Fixes to typos and small errors from v1
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Computational Complexity (cs.CC); Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS); Information Theory (cs.IT); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2607.02444 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2607.02444v2 [quant-ph] for this version)
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 272 words
Related coverage

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jun 7, 2026

Chen and Colleagues Designs Recursive QLSTM Framework for Quantum Recurrent Learning
Quantum Zeitgeist · Jul 15, 2026

AI and Quantum Computing Briefing
livetradingnews.com · Aug 4, 2026