aiqbench analysis
This paper advances the theoretical limits of quantum state tomography by optimizing the sample complexity required to estimate purity using only incoherent measurements. The authors derive both non-adaptive and adaptive algorithms that significantly reduce the number of system copies needed compared to previous bounds, establishing new optimality thresholds for practical experimental setups. These findings directly address the experimental challenges of scaling quantum characterization without relying on complex collective measurement operations.
Optimal Purity Estimation with Incoherent Measurements
arXiv:2609.40248v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In this work, we consider the fundamental task of estimating the purity of an unknown state to within $\textit{multiplicative}$ error $\varepsilon$. When one can perform general collective measurements, $\Theta\left(\frac{\sqrt{d}}{\varepsilon^2} + \frac{d}{\varepsilon}\right)$ copies are known to be necessary and sufficient for this problem [AISW20]. However, implementing collective measurements on such a large number of copies can be experimentally demanding, and we thus aim to characterize the copy complexity of this problem with incoherent measurements. In this setting, the only non-trivial result is a non-adaptive algorithm that uses $O\left( \frac{d}{\varepsilon^2} + \frac{d^2}{\varepsilon} \right)$ copies [PTTW26], which is polynomially larger than the best-known lower bound. Our first result is a new algorithm performing non-adaptive incoherent measurements that succeeds using $O\left( \frac{d}{\varepsilon^2} + \frac{d^{3/2}}{\varepsilon} \right)$ copies, improving on the latter term in the copy complexity. Moreover, we show that for any algorithm restricted to non-adaptive measurements, the above copy complexity is optimal. We also develop a new adaptive estimator for the purity of a state that improves on the above complexity in the high-precision regime, i.e., for $\varepsilon = o(1/d)$. We also show that the non-adaptive and adaptive estimators together yield the optimal complexity for incoherent purity estimation; in particular, we show that the copy complexity of this problem is $$ \Theta\left(\min\left\{ \frac{d}{\varepsilon^2} + \frac{d^{3/2}}{\varepsilon}, \frac{d^2}{\varepsilon} + \frac{\sqrt{d}}{\varepsilon^2}\right\} \right). $$
Abstract:In this work, we consider the fundamental task of estimating the purity of an unknown state to within $\textit{multiplicative}$ error $\varepsilon$. When one can perform general collective measurements, $\Theta\left(\frac{\sqrt{d}}{\varepsilon^2} + \frac{d}{\varepsilon}\right)$ copies are known to be necessary and sufficient for this problem [AISW20]. However, implementing collective measurements on such a large number of copies can be experimentally demanding, and we thus aim to characterize the copy complexity of this problem with incoherent measurements. In this setting, the only non-trivial result is a non-adaptive algorithm that uses $O\left( \frac{d}{\varepsilon^2} + \frac{d^2}{\varepsilon} \right)$ copies [PTTW26], which is polynomially larger than the best-known lower bound. Our first result is a new algorithm performing non-adaptive incoherent measurements that succeeds using $O\left( \frac{d}{\varepsilon^2} + \frac{d^{3/2}}{\varepsilon} \right)$ copies, improving on the latter term in the copy complexity. Moreover, we show that for any algorithm restricted to non-adaptive measurements, the above copy complexity is optimal. We also develop a new adaptive estimator for the purity of a state that improves on the above complexity in the high-precision regime, i.e., for $\varepsilon = o(1/d)$. We also show that the non-adaptive and adaptive estimators together yield the optimal complexity for incoherent purity estimation; in particular, we show that the copy complexity of this problem is $$ \Theta\left(\min\left\{ \frac{d}{\varepsilon^2} + \frac{d^{3/2}}{\varepsilon}, \frac{d^2}{\varepsilon} + \frac{\sqrt{d}}{\varepsilon^2}\right\} \right). $$
arXiv:2609.40248 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2609.40248v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.40248 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 307 words
Related coverage
Asking the Crowd the Right Question: Bias-Cancelling Weights for Federated Learning
arXiv · Oct 6, 2026
Attaining Fundamental Limits of Multiparameter Incoherent Optical Imaging Using Joint-Detection Quantum Measurements
arXiv · Aug 21, 2026

Researchers Define Ultimate Limits for Incoherent Optical Imaging
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 24, 2026
Optimal Quantum State Testing Even with Limited Entanglement
arXiv · Sep 25, 2026