aiqbench analysis
This paper establishes asymptotically tight lower bounds on the gate complexity required to simulate quantum time evolution, challenging previous assumptions derived from block-encoding models. The authors demonstrate that for physical systems with power-law interactions, resource requirements must scale polynomially in $1/\epsilon$ rather than logarithmically. This fundamental result clarifies the computational limits of simulating realistic Hamiltonians using composite qDRIFT and high-order Trotterization techniques.
Optimal Lower Bounds for Hamiltonian Simulation
arXiv:2607.19852v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: For Hamiltonian $H = \sum_j h_j$, we prove asymptotically tight lower bounds on the gate and query complexities of simulating time evolution on a quantum computer. Our bounds hold for arbitrary term norms $\|h_j\|$, time $t$, and trace-distance error $\epsilon$. The matching upper bound (known as composite qDRIFT) consists of high-order Trotterization of the large terms and a randomized first-order Trotterization of the small terms. Unlike prior work that chooses worst-case $\|h_j\|$ to encode the computation of parity or other Boolean functions in time evolution, our proof is elementary and based on a local, bounded-degree classical Hamiltonian. Our work suggests that for many physical systems (e.g., power-law interactions), gate count must scale polynomially in $1/\epsilon$, contrary to the complexity suggested by counting coherent oracle queries such as those in the block-encoding model.
Abstract:For Hamiltonian $H = \sum_j h_j$, we prove asymptotically tight lower bounds on the gate and query complexities of simulating time evolution on a quantum computer. Our bounds hold for arbitrary term norms $\|h_j\|$, time $t$, and trace-distance error $\epsilon$. The matching upper bound (known as composite qDRIFT) consists of high-order Trotterization of the large terms and a randomized first-order Trotterization of the small terms. Unlike prior work that chooses worst-case $\|h_j\|$ to encode the computation of parity or other Boolean functions in time evolution, our proof is elementary and based on a local, bounded-degree classical Hamiltonian. Our work suggests that for many physical systems (e.g., power-law interactions), gate count must scale polynomially in $1/\epsilon$, contrary to the complexity suggested by counting coherent oracle queries such as those in the block-encoding model.
arXiv:2607.19852 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2607.19852v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.19852 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 223 words
Related coverage

New method hits a theoretical limit for quantum algorithm sampling cost
Quantum Zeitgeist · Oct 14, 2026

Researchers Simulate Spin Systems with Optimal Log(n) Depth
Quantum Zeitgeist · Oct 2, 2026

Quantum simulation protocols match monolithic chip complexity
Quantum Zeitgeist · Oct 14, 2026
Optimal T-Count for Block Encodings of Fermionic and Spin Hamiltonians
arXiv · Sep 11, 2026