Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This is a theoretical result on how many copies of an unknown quantum state are needed to estimate properties of it with allowed joint (coherent) measurements, rather than measuring each copy separately. The proven lower bound nearly matches the best known upper bound, so it clarifies the fundamental limits of classical shadow methods for mixed states. Readers working on quantum state learning or tomography should note that the result is a bound, not a practical protocol, and the 82-page length means the full proof is still under review.
Sources coveringarXiv, Quantum Computing Report, Quantum Zeitgeist
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Optimal Lower Bound on the Sample Complexity of Coherent Classical Shadows for Mixed States

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.18031v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study coherent classical shadows protocols for an unknown $d$-dimensional quantum state of rank at most $r$, allowing an arbitrary joint measurement on all available copies. For observables with operator norm at most one and centered squared Frobenius norm at most $F$, we study the minumum number of copies $T$ needed for the protocol to successed with propbability $1 - \delta$. We prove a lower bound on $T$, that depends both on $\delta$ and the number $M$ of post-measurement observables. Denoting $\ell=\max\{\log(2M),\log(1/\delta)\}$, we show that $T=\Omega\left(\min\left\{\frac{\sqrt{rF\ell}}{\varepsilon},\frac{(F\ell)^{2/3}}{\varepsilon^{4/3}}\right\}+\frac{\ell}{\varepsilon^2}\right)$ under the mild assumption $\log(2M)\lesssim d\min\{r,F\}$. The lower bound nearly matches the known upper bound and matches the conjectural strengthening of the known upper bound. The proof is inspired by the framework of the proof of the lower bound for Boolean Hidden Matching. We develop a Gaussian-lift noise kernel that transfers forward and reverse Gaussian hypercontractivity to the Grassmannian, allowing us to bound the distinguishing advantage in an auxiliary game with a revealed query observable. We use Schur--Weyl structure and posterior moment bounds to control arbitrary coherent measurements on the source side.

Abstract:We study coherent classical shadows protocols for an unknown $d$-dimensional quantum state of rank at most $r$, allowing an arbitrary joint measurement on all available copies. For observables with operator norm at most one and centered squared Frobenius norm at most $F$, we study the minumum number of copies $T$ needed for the protocol to successed with propbability $1 - \delta$. We prove a lower bound on $T$, that depends both on $\delta$ and the number $M$ of post-measurement observables. Denoting $\ell=\max\{\log(2M),\log(1/\delta)\}$, we show that $T=\Omega\left(\min\left\{\frac{\sqrt{rF\ell}}{\varepsilon},\frac{(F\ell)^{2/3}}{\varepsilon^{4/3}}\right\}+\frac{\ell}{\varepsilon^2}\right)$ under the mild assumption $\log(2M)\lesssim d\min\{r,F\}$. The lower bound nearly matches the known upper bound and matches the conjectural strengthening of the known upper bound. The proof is inspired by the framework of the proof of the lower bound for Boolean Hidden Matching. We develop a Gaussian-lift noise kernel that transfers forward and reverse Gaussian hypercontractivity to the Grassmannian, allowing us to bound the distinguishing advantage in an auxiliary game with a revealed query observable. We use Schur--Weyl structure and posterior moment bounds to control arbitrary coherent measurements on the source side.

Comments welcome. 82 pages. Apologies for the length; the noise kernel part of the paper might be moved to a separate paper in the future

arXiv:2610.18031 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2610.18031v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.18031 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 294 words

Related coverage