Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This paper introduces a sparse operator-centric framework within complex Clifford algebra for variational quantum algorithms, offering exact pruning rules that significantly reduce measurement shots in finite-shot adaptive selection scenarios. While it does not claim asymptotic speedups over matrix methods, the approach demonstrates high precision on specific Hamiltonian models and provides reproducible strategies to mitigate noise from limited sampling.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Operator-centric Clifford algebra for variational eigensolvers and finite-shot adaptive selection

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2607.17443v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We develop a sparse operator-centric realization of $n$-qubit variational quantum algorithms in the complex Clifford algebra $\mathrm{Cl}(2n,\mathbb{C}) \cong M(2^n,\mathbb{C})$. Density operators, gates, observables, channels, fermionic modes, and adaptive-selection observables are represented in one Pauli-word algebra, with the Jordan--Wigner map providing the exact bridge to anticommuting Clifford generators. We distinguish general Pauli-word rotations from Spin-group rotors and derive an exact transpose-parity rule: for real Hamiltonians and real states, every candidate Pauli word containing an even number of $Y$ factors has zero ADAPT gradient, while odd-$Y$ rotations preserve the real sector. For the critical open transverse-field Ising chain, a depth-three Hamiltonian variational ansatz gives relative energy errors $4.84\times10^{-5}$, $2.19\times10^{-3}$, and $3.67\times10^{-3}$ for $n=4,5,6$. A compact local ADAPT pool is exact at $n=4$ but leaves residual errors at larger sizes; a systematic contiguous three-local odd-$Y$ pool reaches relative errors below $1.3\times10^{-12}$ for $n\leq6$. In 100-seed finite-shot tests at $n=4$, fixed-shot selection succeeds in $0/100$ runs, whereas uniform escalation and confidence-bound racing each succeed in $84/100$ runs; racing lowers median shots by $34\%$. We claim no asymptotic speedup over matrix methods. The contribution is a corrected algebraic formulation, an exact pool-pruning rule, and a reproducible study of measurement-limited adaptive selection.

Abstract:We develop a sparse operator-centric realization of $n$-qubit variational quantum algorithms in the complex Clifford algebra $\mathrm{Cl}(2n,\mathbb{C}) \cong M(2^n,\mathbb{C})$. Density operators, gates, observables, channels, fermionic modes, and adaptive-selection observables are represented in one Pauli-word algebra, with the Jordan--Wigner map providing the exact bridge to anticommuting Clifford generators. We distinguish general Pauli-word rotations from Spin-group rotors and derive an exact transpose-parity rule: for real Hamiltonians and real states, every candidate Pauli word containing an even number of $Y$ factors has zero ADAPT gradient, while odd-$Y$ rotations preserve the real sector. For the critical open transverse-field Ising chain, a depth-three Hamiltonian variational ansatz gives relative energy errors $4.84\times10^{-5}$, $2.19\times10^{-3}$, and $3.67\times10^{-3}$ for $n=4,5,6$. A compact local ADAPT pool is exact at $n=4$ but leaves residual errors at larger sizes; a systematic contiguous three-local odd-$Y$ pool reaches relative errors below $1.3\times10^{-12}$ for $n\leq6$. In 100-seed finite-shot tests at $n=4$, fixed-shot selection succeeds in $0/100$ runs, whereas uniform escalation and confidence-bound racing each succeed in $84/100$ runs; racing lowers median shots by $34\%$. We claim no asymptotic speedup over matrix methods. The contribution is a corrected algebraic formulation, an exact pool-pruning rule, and a reproducible study of measurement-limited adaptive selection.

arXiv:2607.17443 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2607.17443v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.17443 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 287 words

Related coverage