Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This arXiv preprint introduces OpenDGO, a controlled benchmark for LLM-based multi-agent systems across six domains and three collaboration patterns. Its main finding is that no single agent organization works best everywhere: the preferred structure depends on the application, and identical communication graphs can perform differently under different role or input assignments. For AI readers, the practical takeaway is that multi-agent designs should be validated per task rather than assumed to transfer, though the results are from a preprint and have not been independently replicated.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

OpenDGO: Benchmarking Multi-Agent Organizations Across Diverse Application Domains

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.17143v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems are increasingly applied across diverse domains, yet different applications require different forms of agent organization. Existing studies typically adopt predefined organizations, such as Star, Chain, and Tree, or learn communication graphs to improve performance on specific tasks. However, these methods are largely designed and evaluated within a limited set of application domains, providing little understanding of whether an organization effective in one domain remains suitable for others with different collaboration requirements. We present \textbf{OpenDGO}, a controlled benchmark and analysis framework covering six real-world domains and three collaboration settings: Sequential Dependency, Parallel Decomposition, and Information Integration. Under matched tasks, agents, tools, and resource limits, OpenDGO compares fixed and learned organizations while separately examining communication graphs, role assignments, input assignments, resource budgets, and component failures. Our results show that there is no ``one-organization-for-all'' solution: preferred organizations vary across applications, and even the same communication graph can yield different outcomes under different role and input assignments. These findings highlight the need for application-dependent organization design, aiming to understand \emph{which organization is suitable for a given application, under what conditions, and why}.

Abstract:Large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems are increasingly applied across diverse domains, yet different applications require different forms of agent organization. Existing studies typically adopt predefined organizations, such as Star, Chain, and Tree, or learn communication graphs to improve performance on specific tasks. However, these methods are largely designed and evaluated within a limited set of application domains, providing little understanding of whether an organization effective in one domain remains suitable for others with different collaboration requirements. We present \textbf{OpenDGO}, a controlled benchmark and analysis framework covering six real-world domains and three collaboration settings: Sequential Dependency, Parallel Decomposition, and Information Integration. Under matched tasks, agents, tools, and resource limits, OpenDGO compares fixed and learned organizations while separately examining communication graphs, role assignments, input assignments, resource budgets, and component failures. Our results show that there is no ``one-organization-for-all'' solution: preferred organizations vary across applications, and even the same communication graph can yield different outcomes under different role and input assignments. These findings highlight the need for application-dependent organization design, aiming to understand \emph{which organization is suitable for a given application, under what conditions, and why}.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.17143 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.17143v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.17143 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 278 words

Related coverage