Skip to content
Off-topic for aiqbench

Off-topic for aiqbench

This story was gathered from a source we follow but falls outside AI and quantum coverage, so there is no aiqbench take for it.

Open-sourcing evals for open-weight agents

Cline Bot Inc.12 min read

Learn how Cline evaluates and improves open weight coding agents using Terminal Bench, with practical heuristics for model performance, token efficiency, reasoning, providers, and eval optimization.

With new model releases like Fable and Gpt-5.6 Sol, it's becoming increasingly clear that closed-weight models are becoming a very expensive commodity, leaving us at the mercy of frontier labs to tell us what to use and how much. https://x.com/levelsio/status/2075530242186166519 Most coding-agent subscription plans lack pricing transparency, and the credit limits could have different token values depending on the day. Even the most pro-AI-usage, token-maxxing companies are now finding that their options are either to default to open-weight models or simply to make their own harness for efficiency. At Cline, we noticed an unusual rise in the token usage of open-weight models in the last few months for obvious reasons, such as price and quality improvements that make open-weight models on par with or better than closed-weight models. After stack-ranking our usage, we saw that the five most-used models in Cline right now are all open-weight models. So we started digging into how Cline performs on open-weight models. Most Cline users are spoiled SOTA token-maxxers who burn billions of tokens on the latest frontier models. But all of us are experimenting more with open-weight models, learning how to work with them and how to improve them. Our new SDK lets…

Excerpt shown under the publisher's RSS terms · 200 words · full text and figures are on the publisher's site