aiqbench analysis
This research addresses inference-time personalization for Large Language Models by framing user preference adaptation as a contextual dueling bandit problem. The authors introduce a new benchmark dataset based on a tutoring scenario and propose a baseline algorithm that learns a mixture prior to adapt to individual users with minimal data, significantly reducing regret compared to random selection.
Online LLM Personalization from Pairwise Preferences Across Users
arXiv:2610.17203v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models can answer the same question in different styles, but users' preferred styles are hidden and vary across users and questions. We study inference-time personalization through online selection from a fixed set of prompts, each representing a persona. Users arrive sequentially, each asks a short sequence of questions, and the system displays two responses per question and observes one pairwise choice. We formulate this interaction as a variant of the contextual dueling bandit problem in which the learner starts without preference data, adapts within each session, and exploits information shared across users. The objective is to minimize cumulative strong regret, summing the utility gaps of both displayed responses relative to the user's best response among the available options. We make two contributions. First, we introduce the problem and release a reproducible preference benchmark and dataset built around a tutoring case study, containing educational questions, LLM-generated answers in six teaching styles, and pairwise judgments from LLM-simulated students with hidden preference profiles. We fit Bradley-Terry models to these judgments to obtain reference utilities for regret evaluation. Second, we propose a baseline that learns a mixture prior over users from completed sessions and adapts to each new user within the session. On students and topics never used in development, it removes 44-48% of random pairs' excess regret and achieves over half the performance of a per-user linear oracle fitted in hindsight. We release code, prompts, and the benchmark.
Abstract:Large language models can answer the same question in different styles, but users' preferred styles are hidden and vary across users and questions. We study inference-time personalization through online selection from a fixed set of prompts, each representing a persona. Users arrive sequentially, each asks a short sequence of questions, and the system displays two responses per question and observes one pairwise choice. We formulate this interaction as a variant of the contextual dueling bandit problem in which the learner starts without preference data, adapts within each session, and exploits information shared across users. The objective is to minimize cumulative strong regret, summing the utility gaps of both displayed responses relative to the user's best response among the available options. We make two contributions. First, we introduce the problem and release a reproducible preference benchmark and dataset built around a tutoring case study, containing educational questions, LLM-generated answers in six teaching styles, and pairwise judgments from LLM-simulated students with hidden preference profiles. We fit Bradley-Terry models to these judgments to obtain reference utilities for regret evaluation. Second, we propose a baseline that learns a mixture prior over users from completed sessions and adapts to each new user within the session. On students and topics never used in development, it removes 44-48% of random pairs' excess regret and achieves over half the performance of a per-user linear oracle fitted in hindsight. We release code, prompts, and the benchmark.
45 pages, 5 figures. Website: this https URL Code: this https URL Data: this https URL
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2610.17203 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.17203v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.17203 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 354 words
Related coverage
Learning a Speed-adaptive Hip Exoskeleton Control Policy Via Sim-to-real Reinforcement Learning
arXiv · Sep 24, 2026

Exploring Hierarchical Interest Representation For Meta Ads Deep Funnel Optimization
Meta Engineering · Jul 15, 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026

Presentation: Building Evals for AI Adoption: from Principles to Practice
InfoQ · May 29, 2026