aiqbench analysis
This research bridges a critical gap in control theory by adapting multi-armed bandit algorithms to handle partially-observed systems where candidate controllers may be inherently unstable. The proposed data-driven approach offers dimension-free, finite-time guarantees for identifying optimal controllers while simultaneously bounding disturbance effects, overcoming the restrictive stability assumptions that limit current non-asymptotic methods.
Online Learning for Supervisory Switching Control
arXiv:2603.14762v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We study supervisory switching control for partially-observed linear dynamical systems. The objective is to identify and deploy a suitable controller for the unknown system by periodically selecting among a collection of $N$ candidate controllers, some of which may destabilize the underlying system. While classical estimator-based supervisory control guarantees asymptotic stability, it lacks quantitative finite-time performance bounds. Conversely, current non-asymptotic methods in both online learning and system identification require restrictive assumptions that are incompatible in a control setting, such as system stability, which preclude testing potentially unstable controllers. To bridge this gap, we propose a novel, non-asymptotic analysis of supervisory control that adapts multi-armed bandit algorithms to a control-theoretic setting. The proposed data-driven algorithm evaluates candidate controllers via scoring criteria that leverage system observability to isolate the effects of state history, enabling both detection of destabilizing controllers and accurate system identification. We present two algorithmic variants with dimension-free, finite-time guarantees, where each identifies the matching controller in $O(N \log^2 N)$ steps, while simultaneously achieving finite $L_2$-gain with respect to system disturbances.
Abstract:We study supervisory switching control for partially-observed linear dynamical systems. The objective is to identify and deploy a suitable controller for the unknown system by periodically selecting among a collection of $N$ candidate controllers, some of which may destabilize the underlying system. While classical estimator-based supervisory control guarantees asymptotic stability, it lacks quantitative finite-time performance bounds. Conversely, current non-asymptotic methods in both online learning and system identification require restrictive assumptions that are incompatible in a control setting, such as system stability, which preclude testing potentially unstable controllers. To bridge this gap, we propose a novel, non-asymptotic analysis of supervisory control that adapts multi-armed bandit algorithms to a control-theoretic setting. The proposed data-driven algorithm evaluates candidate controllers via scoring criteria that leverage system observability to isolate the effects of state history, enabling both detection of destabilizing controllers and accurate system identification. We present two algorithmic variants with dimension-free, finite-time guarantees, where each identifies the matching controller in $O(N \log^2 N)$ steps, while simultaneously achieving finite $L_2$-gain with respect to system disturbances.
Optimization and Control (math.OC); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Systems and Control (eess.SY)
arXiv:2603.14762 [math.OC]
(or arXiv:2603.14762v4 [math.OC] for this version)
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 189 words
Related coverage
Online Learning for Supervisory Switching Control
arXiv · Jun 9, 2026
Reversible Simplex Supervision with Post-Action Debt Accounting for Goal-Reaching RL
arXiv · Sep 16, 2026
On-policy Distillation with Verifiable Reward
arXiv · Aug 27, 2026

Here’s How Delhi Achieved Its Epic Power-Grid Fix
IEEE Spectrum · Sep 28, 2026