Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This survey provides a critical technical overview of one-stage object detectors, analyzing the architectural evolution from YOLOv1 to YOLOv10 specifically for autonomous driving perception tasks. It offers essential insights into balancing real-time inference speed with detection accuracy while highlighting the persistent gap between benchmark metrics and robust real-world performance. The paper serves as a foundational reference for researchers navigating deployment trade-offs in safety-critical AI systems.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

One-Stage Object Detectors in Autonomous Driving

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.19014v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Autonomous vehicles depend on fast and reliable perception systems to detect surrounding vehicles, pedestrians, cyclists, traffic signs, and other road objects in real time. This paper presents a comprehensive survey and analysis of one-stage object detectors for autonomous driving rather than an implementation of a new detection system. The survey reviews the evolution of major one-stage detectors, including YOLOv1, SSD, RetinaNet, EfficientDet, anchor-free detectors such as FCOS and CenterNet, and recent real-time models such as YOLOv10. It compares these architectures through their design choices, feature-fusion strategies, loss functions, deployment trade-offs, and reported benchmark performance. The paper also summarizes commonly used autonomous-driving datasets, evaluation metrics, open challenges, and future research directions. Overall, this survey highlights how one-stage detectors balance speed, accuracy, efficiency, and robustness, while also emphasizing the remaining gap between benchmark results and dependable real-world autonomous-driving performance.

Abstract:Autonomous vehicles depend on fast and reliable perception systems to detect surrounding vehicles, pedestrians, cyclists, traffic signs, and other road objects in real time. This paper presents a comprehensive survey and analysis of one-stage object detectors for autonomous driving rather than an implementation of a new detection system. The survey reviews the evolution of major one-stage detectors, including YOLOv1, SSD, RetinaNet, EfficientDet, anchor-free detectors such as FCOS and CenterNet, and recent real-time models such as YOLOv10. It compares these architectures through their design choices, feature-fusion strategies, loss functions, deployment trade-offs, and reported benchmark performance. The paper also summarizes commonly used autonomous-driving datasets, evaluation metrics, open challenges, and future research directions. Overall, this survey highlights how one-stage detectors balance speed, accuracy, efficiency, and robustness, while also emphasizing the remaining gap between benchmark results and dependable real-world autonomous-driving performance.

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2608.19014 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2608.19014v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.19014 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 237 words

Related coverage