aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces Multi-Ratio ConceptMoE, a novel architecture enabling a single shared model backbone to dynamically flex compute budgets across multi-turn interactions via token-to-concept compression ratios. By eliminating the need for separate models or rebuilding history states during routing, the approach significantly reduces FLOPs while maintaining competitive accuracy on coding and SQL benchmarks compared to fixed-ratio specialists. The work addresses a critical efficiency challenge in deploying large language models where inference costs vary substantially between conversation turns.
One Model, Multiple Compute Budgets: Multi-Ratio ConceptMoE for Flexible Compute Across Turns
arXiv:2610.14074v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models typically support different inference budgets through separate model sizes or fixed compute configurations. In multi-turn interactions, however, compute demand can vary substantially across turns. Using a high-compute model for every turn wastes computation, while routing among independent models may require rebuilding model-specific history states after switches. We therefore ask whether a single shared model can support multiple compute budgets that can be flexibly assigned across turns. We introduce Multi-Ratio ConceptMoE, which jointly supports token-to-concept compression ratios of 2, 4, and 8 (CR2/CR4/CR8) within a shared backbone. Lightweight full-token modules reduce compression-independent cost, ratio-specific boundary routers support distinct compression levels, and cross-ratio training enables mixed-ratio processing within the same context. Across PTBench and SFTBench, the three fixed modes outperform their compute-matched MoE baselines in all 6 comparisons while remaining competitive with independently trained fixed-ratio specialists. On CodeChat and CoSQL, mixed-ratio inference improves the accuracy--compute trade-off, outperforming the Large MoE by 5.87 and 2.68 percentage points while reducing FLOPs by 41.1% and 12.3%, respectively. Under the same turn-wise budget schedule, Multi-Ratio ConceptMoE further reduces FLOPs by 78.4% and 46.9% relative to routing among independent models. These results demonstrate that a single shared model can provide multiple compute budgets for flexible compute allocation across turns.
Abstract:Large language models typically support different inference budgets through separate model sizes or fixed compute configurations. In multi-turn interactions, however, compute demand can vary substantially across turns. Using a high-compute model for every turn wastes computation, while routing among independent models may require rebuilding model-specific history states after switches. We therefore ask whether a single shared model can support multiple compute budgets that can be flexibly assigned across turns. We introduce Multi-Ratio ConceptMoE, which jointly supports token-to-concept compression ratios of 2, 4, and 8 (CR2/CR4/CR8) within a shared backbone. Lightweight full-token modules reduce compression-independent cost, ratio-specific boundary routers support distinct compression levels, and cross-ratio training enables mixed-ratio processing within the same context. Across PTBench and SFTBench, the three fixed modes outperform their compute-matched MoE baselines in all 6 comparisons while remaining competitive with independently trained fixed-ratio specialists. On CodeChat and CoSQL, mixed-ratio inference improves the accuracy--compute trade-off, outperforming the Large MoE by 5.87 and 2.68 percentage points while reducing FLOPs by 41.1% and 12.3%, respectively. Under the same turn-wise budget schedule, Multi-Ratio ConceptMoE further reduces FLOPs by 78.4% and 46.9% relative to routing among independent models. These results demonstrate that a single shared model can provide multiple compute budgets for flexible compute allocation across turns.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.14074 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.14074v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.14074 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 302 words
Related coverage

The art and science of hyperparameter optimization on Amazon Nova Forge
AWS · Jun 2, 2026

Scaling RL with verl on AMD Instinct MI355X: Async Walkthrough and Sync Benchmark
AMD · Aug 18, 2026

Quadrillion Param Costs: KV Cache, Context Length, Frontier Margins
LessWrong · Jul 27, 2026

Expenditure Horizon: Measuring Optimization Ability, with an Application to NanoGPT
METR · Jul 21, 2026