aiqbench analysis
This research establishes minimax optimal learning rates for kernel ridge regression with random features under general conditions, including misspecified models and heavy-tailed noise. By improving upon previous worst-case bounds and leveraging new inequalities, the study demonstrates that robust performance is achievable with only a mild increase in sample size requirements. The work provides theoretical guarantees essential for deploying scalable kernel methods in real-world scenarios where data distributions deviate from ideal assumptions.
On the Optimality of Random Features under General Conditions: Misspecified Cases and Robust Learning
arXiv:2610.18333v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Random features provide a standard approach to scaling kernel methods to large datasets by approximating the kernel with a finite-dimensional feature map. Existing works of random feature methods primarily focus on well-specified models and light-tailed noise conditions, leaving a gap in understanding their performance under more general conditions, such as misspecified models and heavy-tailed noise. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive and improved analysis of kernel ridge regression with random features (KRR-RF) under general conditions. In the light-tailed noise setting, we improve upon the worst-case uniform bounds of the feature map used in the previous works and lead to the minimax optimal learning rates with $2r+\gamma>\alpha_0$, where $(r,\gamma,\alpha_0)$ denote the regularity of the target function, the effective dimension of the kernel, and the embedding index of the RKHS, respectively. In the heavy-tailed noise setting, we leverage a recently developed Hilbert-valued Fuk-Nagaev inequality and extend the same optimal results under finite weak moment conditions. The additional cost to achieve robustness is a mildly stronger explicit sample-size requirement than in the light-tailed case. For both settings, our results recover the conditions random features budgets (up to log factors) required in the previous works. In the most benign case when $\alpha_0=\gamma$, KRR-RF are minimax optimal for all $r \in (0,1]$. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to establish optimal learning rates for KRR-RF under weak moment conditions in the misspecified setting. Numerical experiments and a real data analysis validate the derived learning rates and demonstrate their practical relevance in the presence of mis-specification and heavy-tailed noise.
Abstract:Random features provide a standard approach to scaling kernel methods to large datasets by approximating the kernel with a finite-dimensional feature map. Existing works of random feature methods primarily focus on well-specified models and light-tailed noise conditions, leaving a gap in understanding their performance under more general conditions, such as misspecified models and heavy-tailed noise. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive and improved analysis of kernel ridge regression with random features (KRR-RF) under general conditions. In the light-tailed noise setting, we improve upon the worst-case uniform bounds of the feature map used in the previous works and lead to the minimax optimal learning rates with $2r+\gamma>\alpha_0$, where $(r,\gamma,\alpha_0)$ denote the regularity of the target function, the effective dimension of the kernel, and the embedding index of the RKHS, respectively. In the heavy-tailed noise setting, we leverage a recently developed Hilbert-valued Fuk-Nagaev inequality and extend the same optimal results under finite weak moment conditions. The additional cost to achieve robustness is a mildly stronger explicit sample-size requirement than in the light-tailed case. For both settings, our results recover the conditions random features budgets (up to log factors) required in the previous works. In the most benign case when $\alpha_0=\gamma$, KRR-RF are minimax optimal for all $r \in (0,1]$. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to establish optimal learning rates for KRR-RF under weak moment conditions in the misspecified setting. Numerical experiments and a real data analysis validate the derived learning rates and demonstrate their practical relevance in the presence of mis-specification and heavy-tailed noise.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.18333 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2610.18333v1 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.18333 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 356 words
Related coverage

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026

Exploding variance of means of exponentials: least-squares to the rescue – Machine Learning Research Blog
francisbach.com · Sep 27, 2026

The Alignment Problem: Computer Science Meets Analytic Philosophy
AI Alignment Forum · Oct 18, 2026
Measuring Reward-Seeking via Contrastive Belief Updates
LessWrong · Jul 21, 2026