Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper provides a rigorous proof confirming the optimality of cyclic search strategies for the multi-path cow-path problem, resolving a longstanding theoretical claim in online algorithms. While listed under Machine Learning, the core contribution is fundamental to data structures and algorithmic theory rather than AI model training or inference. The work advances our understanding of competitive analysis in randomized search problems without introducing new machine learning methodologies.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

On the Cyclic Assumption of the Cow-Path Search Algorithm

arXiv1 min read

arXiv:2610.10253v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In the cow-path problem, a cow must find a goal lying at an unknown distance on one of $w$ paths connected only at the origin, and performance is measured by competitive ratio. Kao, Reif and Tate designed an efficient randomized algorithm in which the cow visits the paths in a fixed cyclic order. They proved the algorithm is optimal for $w=2$, and subsequently Kao, Ma, Sipser and Yin proved its optimality for all $w$, with a claim that no algorithm does better than the best cyclic one. This note provides a detailed proof of that claim.

Abstract:In the cow-path problem, a cow must find a goal lying at an unknown distance on one of $w$ paths connected only at the origin, and performance is measured by competitive ratio. Kao, Reif and Tate designed an efficient randomized algorithm in which the cow visits the paths in a fixed cyclic order. They proved the algorithm is optimal for $w=2$, and subsequently Kao, Ma, Sipser and Yin proved its optimality for all $w$, with a claim that no algorithm does better than the best cyclic one. This note provides a detailed proof of that claim.

Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.10253 [cs.DS]

(or arXiv:2610.10253v1 [cs.DS] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.10253 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 195 words

Related coverage