Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper establishes a fundamental theoretical refinement in the Information Bottleneck method, proving that binary source representations can always be achieved with at most two symbols rather than the general bound of three. By tightening the cardinality constraint for binary inputs, this work advances the mathematical foundations of representation learning and dimensionality reduction in machine learning systems. The result offers new insights into optimizing information retention under rate constraints, which is critical for developing efficient AI models.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

On the Cardinality of Optimal Representations in the Binary-Source Information Bottleneck

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.06627v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The information bottleneck (IB) seeks a representation $U$ of a source $X$ that retains as much information as possible about a target $Y$, subject to a constraint on $I(U;X)$. A classical argument shows that it suffices to consider representations with at most $|\mathcal{X}|+1$ symbols, and this bound is known to be tight whenever $|\mathcal{X}| \geq 3$. We show that the binary case behaves differently: if $X$ is binary and $Y$ is finite, then for every joint distribution of $(X,Y)$ and every rate constraint, the IB optimum is attained by a binary $U$. Hence the bound $|\mathcal{U}| \leq |\mathcal{X}|+1$ sharpens to $|\mathcal{U}| \leq |\mathcal{X}|$ for binary sources. The proof combines a separating hyperplane argument with the observation that, for a binary source, the ratio of the second derivatives of the two entropy functions involved is concave.

Abstract:The information bottleneck (IB) seeks a representation $U$ of a source $X$ that retains as much information as possible about a target $Y$, subject to a constraint on $I(U;X)$. A classical argument shows that it suffices to consider representations with at most $|\mathcal{X}|+1$ symbols, and this bound is known to be tight whenever $|\mathcal{X}| \geq 3$. We show that the binary case behaves differently: if $X$ is binary and $Y$ is finite, then for every joint distribution of $(X,Y)$ and every rate constraint, the IB optimum is attained by a binary $U$. Hence the bound $|\mathcal{U}| \leq |\mathcal{X}|+1$ sharpens to $|\mathcal{U}| \leq |\mathcal{X}|$ for binary sources. The proof combines a separating hyperplane argument with the observation that, for a binary source, the ratio of the second derivatives of the two entropy functions involved is concave.

9 pages. Feedback and comments are welcome!

Information Theory (cs.IT); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Optimization and Control (math.OC)

arXiv:2610.06627 [cs.IT]

(or arXiv:2610.06627v1 [cs.IT] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.06627 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 243 words

Related coverage