aiqbench analysis
This research introduces a novel framework for passively learning precise Metric Interval Temporal Logic (MITL) specifications, addressing limitations in existing methods that are restricted to deterministic or limited fragments of timed logic. By reducing the complex timed learning problem into a scalable untimed one, the approach embeds quantitative timing constraints directly into Boolean atomic propositions to leverage optimized off-the-shelf LTL tools. The method guarantees completeness for finding separating specifications and demonstrates effectiveness across benchmarks, advancing automated verification for real-time systems.
On Synthesis of Metric Interval Temporal Logics
arXiv:2609.01032v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automated mining of formal specifications is vital for verifying real-time systems. However, existing passive learning approaches remain restricted to deterministic specifications or limited fragments of Timed Regular Expressions (TRE). To our knowledge, this paper presents the first framework to tackle \emph{precise} passive learning for an expressive timed logic, \emph{Metric Interval Temporal Logic} (MITL) without relying on predefined templates or restricted logic fragments. Our approach formally reduces the timed learning problem into a scalable untimed one. By identifying quantitative timing differences between positive and negative traces, we synthesise precise timed constraints and inject them as new Boolean atomic propositions. This embeds timing into the alphabet, delegating the complex formula evaluation to highly optimised, off-the-shelf untimed LTL tools. Crucially, our framework is complete, guaranteeing a separating specification can always be found. We evaluate our implementation across several benchmarks, demonstrating the effectiveness of our approach.
Abstract:Automated mining of formal specifications is vital for verifying real-time systems. However, existing passive learning approaches remain restricted to deterministic specifications or limited fragments of Timed Regular Expressions (TRE). To our knowledge, this paper presents the first framework to tackle \emph{precise} passive learning for an expressive timed logic, \emph{Metric Interval Temporal Logic} (MITL) without relying on predefined templates or restricted logic fragments. Our approach formally reduces the timed learning problem into a scalable untimed one. By identifying quantitative timing differences between positive and negative traces, we synthesise precise timed constraints and inject them as new Boolean atomic propositions. This embeds timing into the alphabet, delegating the complex formula evaluation to highly optimised, off-the-shelf untimed LTL tools. Crucially, our framework is complete, guaranteeing a separating specification can always be found. We evaluate our implementation across several benchmarks, demonstrating the effectiveness of our approach.
Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.01032 [cs.LO]
(or arXiv:2609.01032v1 [cs.LO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.01032 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 241 words
Related coverage

Scale AV Perception Across Vehicle Platforms with NVIDIA Omniverse NuRec
NVIDIA · Aug 31, 2026
Evaluating Temporal Reasoning in Large Language Models: Event Temporal Relation Extraction with Allen's Interval Algebra, Logical Consistency, and Relative Time in Narratives
arXiv · Oct 14, 2026

Build durable agents with Temporal and Lakebase
Databricks · Sep 8, 2026
Are the Financial Reasoning from LLMs Credible? A Real World Test over Long-Horizon Statements
arXiv · Aug 3, 2026