Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research establishes the theoretical necessity of specific stopping rules, demonstrating that CART achieves minimax spatial adaptation only with minimum impurity decrease rather than standard leaf-size constraints. By proving these rates hold simultaneously across heterogeneous domains, the study provides a rigorous statistical foundation for why certain heuristic implementations outperform others in regression tasks.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

On Stopping Rules and Spatial Adaptation for CART

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.15649v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The popular CART algorithm for regression trees combines a greedy splitting rule with a stopping rule, but while the splitting rule has been well studied, the statistical role of stopping rules is less well understood. Meanwhile, although regression trees fit using Bayesian methods or via empirical risk minimization (ERM) have been shown to be spatially adaptive to local smoothness and anisotropy, it is unknown whether CART can achieve the same adaptation. We address these gaps by proving that, under spatially heterogeneous and anisotropic smoothness and appropriate structural assumptions on the regression function and covariate distribution, CART with the minimum impurity decrease (MID) stopping rule and a suitable threshold achieves pointwise rates that are minimax up to logarithmic factors. These rates hold simultaneously over all points in the domain. Moreover, we prove that spatial adaptation cannot be achieved under the widely used minimum leaf size stopping rule. Together, these results establish a precise statistical role for the MID stopping rule and provide a theoretical basis for the empirical success of CART.

Abstract:The popular CART algorithm for regression trees combines a greedy splitting rule with a stopping rule, but while the splitting rule has been well studied, the statistical role of stopping rules is less well understood. Meanwhile, although regression trees fit using Bayesian methods or via empirical risk minimization (ERM) have been shown to be spatially adaptive to local smoothness and anisotropy, it is unknown whether CART can achieve the same adaptation. We address these gaps by proving that, under spatially heterogeneous and anisotropic smoothness and appropriate structural assumptions on the regression function and covariate distribution, CART with the minimum impurity decrease (MID) stopping rule and a suitable threshold achieves pointwise rates that are minimax up to logarithmic factors. These rates hold simultaneously over all points in the domain. Moreover, we prove that spatial adaptation cannot be achieved under the widely used minimum leaf size stopping rule. Together, these results establish a precise statistical role for the MID stopping rule and provide a theoretical basis for the empirical success of CART.

Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Statistics Theory (math.ST)

arXiv:2608.15649 [stat.ML]

(or arXiv:2608.15649v1 [stat.ML] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.15649 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 270 words

Related coverage