aiqbench analysis
This research clarifies the fundamental distinction between heat and work in quantum many-body systems by analyzing energy extraction via Local Operations and Classical Communication (LOCC). By optimizing LOCC protocols, the study defines extractable daemonic ergotropy as work while attributing residual nonlocal correlations to heat. The findings establish generalized Clausius inequalities that reconcile these definitions with traditional thermodynamic perspectives using a Kitaev-like model.
On Identification of Heat and Work in Quantum Many-Body Systems with Local Operations and Classical Communication
arXiv:2608.00993v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: How we identify heat and work is a fundamental question in modern quantum thermodynamics. Usually, heat and work are attributed to changes in the density matrix and the Hamiltonian, respectively, during time-evolution processes in quantum systems. Recently, it has been recognized that this identification is ambiguous. Furthermore, quantum thermodynamics involving quantum measurement is still under development. Motivated by these on-going works, we consider a quantum many-body system from which we extract energy by local operations and classical communication (LOCC) according to the quantum energy teleportation (QET) protocol. The central idea to define heat and work unambiguously is based on a sharp insight into the optimization condition of LOCC. When LOCC is optimized, the extractable energy by QET becomes a daemonic ergotropy; thus, it can be attributed as work. On the other hand, when LOCC is not optimized, we have not squeezed out all the energy with the unitary operation. It means there is uncontrollable energy left in the system. The uncontrollable energy can be attributed as heat after careful treatment of many-body interactions. The heat term consists of nonlocal correlation due to communication between remote participants, and the correlation cannot be directly observed for the participant in the subsystem. Thus, this feature is consistent with the traditional perspective of heat as an uncontrollable energy. To deeply understand the nature of heat, we derive two types of generalized Clausius inequality in our effective quantum thermodynamics, and discuss the direction of the inequality. To justify our perspective, we examine a one-dimensional Kitaev-like model and discuss the physical meaning of effective temperature in our thermodynamics.
Abstract:How we identify heat and work is a fundamental question in modern quantum thermodynamics. Usually, heat and work are attributed to changes in the density matrix and the Hamiltonian, respectively, during time-evolution processes in quantum systems. Recently, it has been recognized that this identification is ambiguous. Furthermore, quantum thermodynamics involving quantum measurement is still under development. Motivated by these on-going works, we consider a quantum many-body system from which we extract energy by local operations and classical communication (LOCC) according to the quantum energy teleportation (QET) protocol. The central idea to define heat and work unambiguously is based on a sharp insight into the optimization condition of LOCC. When LOCC is optimized, the extractable energy by QET becomes a daemonic ergotropy; thus, it can be attributed as work. On the other hand, when LOCC is not optimized, we have not squeezed out all the energy with the unitary operation. It means there is uncontrollable energy left in the system. The uncontrollable energy can be attributed as heat after careful treatment of many-body interactions. The heat term consists of nonlocal correlation due to communication between remote participants, and the correlation cannot be directly observed for the participant in the subsystem. Thus, this feature is consistent with the traditional perspective of heat as an uncontrollable energy. To deeply understand the nature of heat, we derive two types of generalized Clausius inequality in our effective quantum thermodynamics, and discuss the direction of the inequality. To justify our perspective, we examine a one-dimensional Kitaev-like model and discuss the physical meaning of effective temperature in our thermodynamics.
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Statistical Mechanics (cond-mat.stat-mech)
arXiv:2608.00993 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2608.00993v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.00993 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 359 words
Related coverage
Synthesis Superintelligence: from Semiconductors to Superconductors — Periodic Labs’ Liam Fedus and Ekin Dogus Cubuk
Latent Space · Oct 8, 2026

How Peking University Engineers Control Prethermalization via Band Structure
Quantum Zeitgeist · Jul 29, 2026

New theory ranks the complexity of quantum system simulations
Quantum Zeitgeist · Oct 13, 2026

Thermodynamics and Objects
LessWrong · Sep 23, 2026