Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper establishes a novel $\ell_0$-type stability theory for subdominant ultrametrics derived from single-linkage clustering, demonstrating that sparse perturbations propagate strictly through the Minimum Spanning Tree (MST). By deriving sharp Hamming-Lipschitz bounds and proving conditional near-additivity principles, the authors provide rigorous vulnerability diagnostics for hierarchical representations in deep embedding graphs. These theoretical advances offer critical insights into how minor data edits impact global structural summaries without relying on loose Gromov-Hausdorff metrics.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

On Hamming-Lipschitz Type Stability of the Subdominant (Minmax) Ultrametric: Theory and Simple Proofs

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2608.04014v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The subdominant (minmax) ultrametric is a canonical tree-structured summary of a dissimilarity matrix, arising equivalently as the ultrametric induced by single-linkage clustering. While its classical stability theory is usually formulated in $\ell_\infty$ or Gromov--Hausdorff terms, such bounds are poorly suited to sparse perturbations that alter only a few pairwise distances. We develop an $\ell_0$-type stability theory for this operator. Our analysis shows that sparse edits propagate only through the minimum spanning tree (MST): a pairwise ultrametric value can change only if its tree path crosses an edited edge or a cut newly exposed by an edited off-tree edge. This yields a sharp per-edit exposed-cut score and a tree-only global envelope, leading to Hamming--Lipschitz bounds on the number of ultrametric entries that can change. We also prove sharpness results showing that this dependence on tree geometry is unavoidable: under strict cut separation the tree-edge bound is attained exactly, and for off-tree edits there are explicit families in which one edited distance changes $\Theta(n^2)$ ultrametric entries. In addition, we prove a conditional near-additivity principle for multiple edits under certified large per-edit changed regions and negligible aggregate overlap. Experiments on deep-embedding graphs show that the resulting structural scores provide useful vulnerability diagnostics for hierarchical representations.

Abstract:The subdominant (minmax) ultrametric is a canonical tree-structured summary of a dissimilarity matrix, arising equivalently as the ultrametric induced by single-linkage clustering. While its classical stability theory is usually formulated in $\ell_\infty$ or Gromov--Hausdorff terms, such bounds are poorly suited to sparse perturbations that alter only a few pairwise distances. We develop an $\ell_0$-type stability theory for this operator. Our analysis shows that sparse edits propagate only through the minimum spanning tree (MST): a pairwise ultrametric value can change only if its tree path crosses an edited edge or a cut newly exposed by an edited off-tree edge. This yields a sharp per-edit exposed-cut score and a tree-only global envelope, leading to Hamming--Lipschitz bounds on the number of ultrametric entries that can change. We also prove sharpness results showing that this dependence on tree geometry is unavoidable: under strict cut separation the tree-edge bound is attained exactly, and for off-tree edits there are explicit families in which one edited distance changes $\Theta(n^2)$ ultrametric entries. In addition, we prove a conditional near-additivity principle for multiple edits under certified large per-edit changed regions and negligible aggregate overlap. Experiments on deep-embedding graphs show that the resulting structural scores provide useful vulnerability diagnostics for hierarchical representations.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2608.04014 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2608.04014v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.04014 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 297 words

Related coverage