aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces ObsDriveBench, a novel benchmark designed specifically to evaluate vision-language models in autonomous driving scenarios involving adverse weather conditions like fog and rain. By incorporating multi-modal inputs from cameras, LiDAR, and radar alongside metrics for observability awareness and spatial reliability, it addresses the critical gap of how current AI systems degrade when environmental visibility is compromised. The study also presents an improved model trained via reinforcement learning to maintain robustness under these challenging real-world constraints.
ObsDriveBench: Benchmarking Multimodal Understanding under Adverse Weather with Observability Awareness
arXiv:2607.23537v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autonomous driving under adverse weather remains a critical challenge, yet existing vision-language benchmarks mainly evaluate under standard conditions, synthetic corruptions, or single modality. As a result, it remains unclear how vision-language models behave under real-world adverse weather with multi-modal inputs. We argue that a key difficulty lies in degraded environmental observability: under fog, rain, snow, and low illumination, multi-modal observations become unreliable and cross-modally inconsistent, posing challenges to scene understanding, and subsequent decision-making. To study this, we introduce \textbf{ObsDriveBench}, a real-world multi-modal benchmark for adverse-weather autonomous driving. Our benchmark is designed with three capability dimensions: \textbf{observability awareness}, \textbf{spatial reliability}, and \textbf{risk-aware decision-making}, enabling fine-grained diagnosis of model behavior under degraded observations. We construct the benchmark through observability meta-annotation, scene description, and capability oriented multiple-choice tasks over synchronized camera, LiDAR, and radar inputs, forming a benchmark with over 14k training and 13k test questions. Experiments reveal consistent performance degradation of existing vision-language models. We further introduce \textbf{ObsDrive} model with normal-weather supervised fine-tuning and adverse-weather reinforcement learning, improving robustness across all three capabilities. The dataset and evaluation code will be released at \href{https://github.com/russellyq/ObsDriveBench}{\texttt{ObsDriveBench}}.
Abstract:Autonomous driving under adverse weather remains a critical challenge, yet existing vision-language benchmarks mainly evaluate under standard conditions, synthetic corruptions, or single modality. As a result, it remains unclear how vision-language models behave under real-world adverse weather with multi-modal inputs. We argue that a key difficulty lies in degraded environmental observability: under fog, rain, snow, and low illumination, multi-modal observations become unreliable and cross-modally inconsistent, posing challenges to scene understanding, and subsequent decision-making. To study this, we introduce \textbf{ObsDriveBench}, a real-world multi-modal benchmark for adverse-weather autonomous driving. Our benchmark is designed with three capability dimensions: \textbf{observability awareness}, \textbf{spatial reliability}, and \textbf{risk-aware decision-making}, enabling fine-grained diagnosis of model behavior under degraded observations. We construct the benchmark through observability meta-annotation, scene description, and capability oriented multiple-choice tasks over synchronized camera, LiDAR, and radar inputs, forming a benchmark with over 14k training and 13k test questions. Experiments reveal consistent performance degradation of existing vision-language models. We further introduce \textbf{ObsDrive} model with normal-weather supervised fine-tuning and adverse-weather reinforcement learning, improving robustness across all three capabilities. The dataset and evaluation code will be released at \href{this https URL}{\texttt{ObsDriveBench}}.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2607.23537 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2607.23537v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.23537 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 277 words
Related coverage
Evidence-Grounded Trustworthy Multimodal Reasoning and Evaluation Benchmark in Complex Urban Scenes
arXiv · Aug 28, 2026
Evidence-Grounded Trustworthy Multimodal Reasoning and Evaluation Benchmark in Complex Urban Scenes
arXiv · Sep 1, 2026
HoloCount: A Holistic Visual Counting Benchmark for MLLMs
arXiv · Aug 7, 2026
GeoOutageBench: Benchmarking Ambiguity-aware, Ontology-grounded Geospatiotemporal KGQA for Multimodal Power Outage and Resilience Analysis
arXiv · Oct 1, 2026