aiqbench analysis
Oblivion introduces a novel framework where LLM agents implement selective forgetting through decay-driven accessibility rather than explicit deletion, mimicking human memory efficiency. By decoupling read and write paths to dynamically reinforce only high-utility memories, the system significantly reduces token costs while maintaining performance on long-horizon tasks. This approach addresses critical scalability issues in memory-augmented systems by treating memory management as a control problem essential for sustained agent intelligence.
Oblivion: Self-Adaptive Agentic Memory Control through Decay-Driven Activation
arXiv:2604.00131v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Human memory adapts through selective forgetting: experiences become less accessible over time but can be reactivated by reinforcement or contextual cues. In contrast, memory-augmented LLM agents rely on "always-on" retrieval and "flat" memory storage, causing high interference and latency as histories grow. We introduce Oblivion, a memory control framework that casts forgetting as decay-driven reductions in accessibility -- not explicit deletion. Oblivion decouples memory control into read and write paths. The read path decides when to consult memory, based on agent uncertainty and memory buffer utility, avoiding redundant always-on access. The write path decides what to strengthen, by reinforcing memories contributing to forming the response. Together, this enables hierarchical memory organization that maintains persistent high-level strategies while dynamically loading details as needed. We evaluate on both static and dynamic long-horizon interaction benchmarks. Oblivion outperforms both direct and memory-augmented baselines, while reducing token cost by up to 73% at 120K interaction spans. These results show that treating memory as a control problem -- deciding when to retrieve and what to reinforce -- is essential for sustaining long-horizon agent performance.
Abstract:Human memory adapts through selective forgetting: experiences become less accessible over time but can be reactivated by reinforcement or contextual cues. In contrast, memory-augmented LLM agents rely on "always-on" retrieval and "flat" memory storage, causing high interference and latency as histories grow. We introduce Oblivion, a memory control framework that casts forgetting as decay-driven reductions in accessibility -- not explicit deletion. Oblivion decouples memory control into read and write paths. The read path decides when to consult memory, based on agent uncertainty and memory buffer utility, avoiding redundant always-on access. The write path decides what to strengthen, by reinforcing memories contributing to forming the response. Together, this enables hierarchical memory organization that maintains persistent high-level strategies while dynamically loading details as needed. We evaluate on both static and dynamic long-horizon interaction benchmarks. Oblivion outperforms both direct and memory-augmented baselines, while reducing token cost by up to 73% at 120K interaction spans. These results show that treating memory as a control problem -- deciding when to retrieve and what to reinforce -- is essential for sustaining long-horizon agent performance.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2604.00131 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2604.00131v3 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.00131 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 274 words
Related coverage
CAMeR: Keyword-Gated Hybrid Activation for Adaptive Memory Retention in LLM Agents
arXiv · Jul 25, 2026
Biological Superintelligence
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026

Koopman Theory and Metaethics
LessWrong · Sep 19, 2026

Multi-agent social intelligence with Strands Agents and Amazon Bedrock
AWS · Jul 14, 2026