aiqbench analysis
This research introduces NOVA, a framework that enhances Large Language Model reliability in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems by specifically addressing overconfidence caused by noisy or contradictory retrieved evidence. Through supervised fine-tuning on rule-guided data, the method achieves significant improvements in Expected Calibration Error without requiring stronger teacher models, offering a practical path toward more epistemically robust AI deployments.
NOVA: NOise-aware Verbal Confidence CAlibration for Robust Large Language Models in RAG Systems
arXiv:2601.11004v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Accurately assessing model confidence is essential for deploying large language models (LLMs) in mission-critical factual domains. While retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is widely adopted to improve grounding, confidence calibration in RAG settings remains poorly understood. We conduct a systematic study across four benchmarks, revealing that LLMs exhibit poor calibration performance especially when noisy contexts are retrieved. Specifically, contradictory or irrelevant evidence tends to exacerbate the model's overconfidence issue. To address this, we propose NOVA Rules (NOise-Aware Verbal Confidence CAlibration Rules) to provide a principled foundation for resolving overconfidence under noise. We further design NOVA, a noise-aware calibration framework that synthesizes supervision from ~2K HotpotQA examples guided by these rules. By performing supervised fine-tuning (SFT) with this data, NOVA equips models with intrinsic noise awareness without relying on stronger teacher models. Empirical results show that NOVA yields substantial gains, improving ECE scores by 10.9% in-domain and 8.0% out-of-domain. By bridging the gap between retrieval noise and verbal calibration, NOVA paves the way for both accurate and epistemically reliable LLMs.
Abstract:Accurately assessing model confidence is essential for deploying large language models (LLMs) in mission-critical factual domains. While retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is widely adopted to improve grounding, confidence calibration in RAG settings remains poorly understood. We conduct a systematic study across four benchmarks, revealing that LLMs exhibit poor calibration performance especially when noisy contexts are retrieved. Specifically, contradictory or irrelevant evidence tends to exacerbate the model's overconfidence issue. To address this, we propose NOVA Rules (NOise-Aware Verbal Confidence CAlibration Rules) to provide a principled foundation for resolving overconfidence under noise. We further design NOVA, a noise-aware calibration framework that synthesizes supervision from ~2K HotpotQA examples guided by these rules. By performing supervised fine-tuning (SFT) with this data, NOVA equips models with intrinsic noise awareness without relying on stronger teacher models. Empirical results show that NOVA yields substantial gains, improving ECE scores by 10.9% in-domain and 8.0% out-of-domain. By bridging the gap between retrieval noise and verbal calibration, NOVA paves the way for both accurate and epistemically reliable LLMs.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2601.11004 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2601.11004v4 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.11004 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 260 words
Related coverage
NOVA: NOise-aware Verbal Confidence CAlibration for Robust Large Language Models in RAG Systems
arXiv · Jun 12, 2026
Reliability-aware Cross-sample Enhancement for Robust Multimodal Sentiment Analysis
arXiv · Sep 28, 2026
Links #3: 2026/06 Part 1
LessWrong · Jun 15, 2026

Always ask your agent to be honest
LessWrong · Sep 16, 2026