Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper introduces Priority-Constrained Descent (PCD), a gradient-based framework that addresses the symmetry limitations of existing multi-objective optimization methods by explicitly enforcing hierarchical structures between primary and secondary goals. By preserving the direction of primary descent while allowing controlled distortion for secondary constraints like sparsity or robustness, PCD achieves Pareto dominance with interpretable trade-offs in structured network compression tasks. The method offers closed-form solutions for low-dimensional objective spaces and provides a more nuanced control mechanism via a single hyperparameter compared to standard approaches.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Not All Objectives Are Born Equal: Priority-Constrained Descent for Hierarchical Multi-Objective Optimization

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2606.29521v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Deep learning problems rarely involve objectives that are equal in importance. A primary objective defines the goal, whilst secondary objectives, such as sparsity, compression, or robustness constrain the solution. While existing multi-objective methods have proven effective in practice, they have a clear symmetry problem and neglect the inherent objective hierarchy built into these objective spaces. We introduce Priority-Constrained Descent (PCD), a gradient-based optimization framework designed to explicitly exploit hierarchical objective structures. PCD preserves the direction of primary descent whilst allowing for the minimal distortion necessary to guarantee progress on secondary objectives, controlled by a single $\tau \in [0, 1]$ that dictates the strength of the distortion. The resulting formulation is invariant to objective scaling and admits exact closed-form solutions for problems with two and three objectives. We evaluate PCD within structured network compression settings, unstructured sparsity and low-rankness, and across a variety of synthetic experiments, showing Pareto dominance and better per-objective performance with secondary progress guarantees over existing methods, further exhibiting the interpretable trade-off that $\tau$ provides.

Abstract:Deep learning problems rarely involve objectives that are equal in importance. A primary objective defines the goal, whilst secondary objectives, such as sparsity, compression, or robustness constrain the solution. While existing multi-objective methods have proven effective in practice, they have a clear symmetry problem and neglect the inherent objective hierarchy built into these objective spaces. We introduce Priority-Constrained Descent (PCD), a gradient-based optimization framework designed to explicitly exploit hierarchical objective structures. PCD preserves the direction of primary descent whilst allowing for the minimal distortion necessary to guarantee progress on secondary objectives, controlled by a single $\tau \in [0, 1]$ that dictates the strength of the distortion. The resulting formulation is invariant to objective scaling and admits exact closed-form solutions for problems with two and three objectives. We evaluate PCD within structured network compression settings, unstructured sparsity and low-rankness, and across a variety of synthetic experiments, showing Pareto dominance and better per-objective performance with secondary progress guarantees over existing methods, further exhibiting the interpretable trade-off that $\tau$ provides.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)

arXiv:2606.29521 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2606.29521v2 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.29521 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 262 words

Related coverage