aiqbench analysis
This research exposes a critical blind spot in neural morphological generation, revealing that rare, structurally specific verb subtypes in Japanese can disproportionately skew error rates despite high aggregate accuracy. By isolating the causal link between extreme low-frequency patterns and orthographic processes, the study provides a necessary framework for fine-grained evaluation beyond standard benchmark metrics. These findings are essential for developing more robust and data-efficient language models that avoid systematic failures in niche morphological classes.
Not All Irregularity Is Equal: Causally Isolating a Rare Failure Mode in Japanese Morphological Inflection
arXiv:2609.21179v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Neural morphological generation systems often achieve high aggregate accuracy on benchmark datasets, yet such performance can conceal systematic errors clustered in rare morphological subclasses. We present an orthography-aware diagnosis of Japanese past-tense verb inflection, treating hiragana not merely as a transcriptional medium but as a representational system that encodes morphophonological structure. Using two character-level Transformer architectures evaluated across five random seeds, we show that although both systems exceed 97% aggregate accuracy, a single structurally specific irregular subtype, verbs whose stems end in /e/ and require gemination before the past-tense suffix and make up fewer than 1% of the data, accounts for a disproportionate 30-43% share of residual errors and contributes roughly 34-48x its prevalence to total errors. We then move from diagnosis to causal isolation: controlled ablation experiments show that removing this subtype alone produces larger accuracy gains than removing all irregular verbs combined. These findings indicate that error concentration in neural morphological learning is not driven by irregularity per se, but by the interaction between extreme low-frequency morphological patterns and specific orthographic processes. We argue that morphological evaluation should incorporate fine-grained subclass analysis, and discuss implications for data-efficient, developmentally plausible language model pretraining.
Abstract:Neural morphological generation systems often achieve high aggregate accuracy on benchmark datasets, yet such performance can conceal systematic errors clustered in rare morphological subclasses. We present an orthography-aware diagnosis of Japanese past-tense verb inflection, treating hiragana not merely as a transcriptional medium but as a representational system that encodes morphophonological structure. Using two character-level Transformer architectures evaluated across five random seeds, we show that although both systems exceed 97% aggregate accuracy, a single structurally specific irregular subtype, verbs whose stems end in /e/ and require gemination before the past-tense suffix and make up fewer than 1% of the data, accounts for a disproportionate 30-43% share of residual errors and contributes roughly 34-48x its prevalence to total errors. We then move from diagnosis to causal isolation: controlled ablation experiments show that removing this subtype alone produces larger accuracy gains than removing all irregular verbs combined. These findings indicate that error concentration in neural morphological learning is not driven by irregularity per se, but by the interaction between extreme low-frequency morphological patterns and specific orthographic processes. We argue that morphological evaluation should incorporate fine-grained subclass analysis, and discuss implications for data-efficient, developmentally plausible language model pretraining.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.21179 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.21179v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.21179 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 289 words
Related coverage

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · Oct 12, 2026

Why do models task game?
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 6, 2026

PIRAMID: Progress and Plans
LessWrong · Jul 27, 2026

Handling Imbalanced Classification: What Works Better Than SMOTE
Analytics Vidhya · Jul 12, 2026