aiqbench analysis
This study applies the lossy context surprisal theory to explain why humans accept ungrammatical sentences containing negative polarity items, attributing the effect to imperfect memory encoding of determiners. Experimental results confirm that similarity between determiners strengthens these illusions, supporting the view that language processing is a resource-rational reconstruction of noisy input rather than strict grammatical adherence. The findings provide empirical evidence for how working memory limitations shape human linguistic interpretation in complex syntactic structures.
Noisy memory encoding explains negative polarity illusions
arXiv:2606.04340v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A sentence like "The authors that no critics recommended have ever received acknowledgment for a best-selling novel" is sometimes rated as acceptable even though, strictly speaking, it is ungrammatical because the negative polarity word "ever" is not licensed where it is. This behavioral effect is sometimes called a "negative polarity illusion". Here we propose that the lossy context surprisal theory of Hahn et al. (2022) -- whereby people have an imperfect encoding of complex sentences -- might explain this effect. We hypothesize that people have poor memory representation of the determiners in the main-clause and embedded-clause subjects and could entertain a determiner exchange that licenses ever. We propose that more similar determiners in those positions would trigger stronger illusion effects. Acceptability judgment tasks with six novel determiner pairs (e.g., "few" and "many", "few" and "most") support our proposal, showing, specifically, that a novel sentence, "Many authors that few critics recommended have ever received acknowledgment for a best-selling novel", triggered a much stronger illusion than the canonical one even without time pressure. These results offer further support for the suggestion that human language processing is imperfect and resource-rational: in face of working memory limitations, humans rationally reconstruct what is most likely from noisy linguistic input to facilitate downstream processing.
Abstract:A sentence like "The authors that no critics recommended have ever received acknowledgment for a best-selling novel" is sometimes rated as acceptable even though, strictly speaking, it is ungrammatical because the negative polarity word "ever" is not licensed where it is. This behavioral effect is sometimes called a "negative polarity illusion". Here we propose that the lossy context surprisal theory of Hahn et al. (2022) -- whereby people have an imperfect encoding of complex sentences -- might explain this effect. We hypothesize that people have poor memory representation of the determiners in the main-clause and embedded-clause subjects and could entertain a determiner exchange that licenses ever. We propose that more similar determiners in those positions would trigger stronger illusion effects. Acceptability judgment tasks with six novel determiner pairs (e.g., "few" and "many", "few" and "most") support our proposal, showing, specifically, that a novel sentence, "Many authors that few critics recommended have ever received acknowledgment for a best-selling novel", triggered a much stronger illusion than the canonical one even without time pressure. These results offer further support for the suggestion that human language processing is imperfect and resource-rational: in face of working memory limitations, humans rationally reconstruct what is most likely from noisy linguistic input to facilitate downstream processing.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2606.04340 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2606.04340v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.04340 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 303 words
Related coverage
Do LLMs Really Forget? Hidden-State Leakage in Model Unlearning and How to Fix it
arXiv · Sep 30, 2026
Now You See the Hate: Adaptive View Retrieval for Hidden Hateful Illusions
arXiv · Jul 22, 2026

Entanglement Builds Space-Time, Linking Quantumness to Gravity
Quantum Zeitgeist · Jun 4, 2026
The Illusion of Control: Why Bare Classifier Inversion Silently Fails in Concept-Bottleneck Text Generation
arXiv · Aug 25, 2026