aiqbench analysis
This theoretical advance resolves open questions in online convex optimization by establishing noise-adaptive regret bounds that improve upon classical baselines for full-information settings. The work also demonstrates a formal separation in confidence costs between full-information and bandit feedback models, while providing simultaneous guarantees for constrained optimization problems. These results offer a rigorous foundation for handling unbounded sub-Gaussian noise without truncation artifacts, advancing the mathematical limits of adaptive learning algorithms.
Noise-Adaptive High-Probability Regret Bounds for Online Convex Optimization
arXiv:2606.08028v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study high-probability regret bounds for online convex optimization (OCO) with strongly convex losses and establish three results that resolve open questions at the intersection of noise adaptivity, feedback structure, and constraint satisfaction. For the full-information setting with sub-Gaussian stochastic gradients, we prove a noise-adaptive high-probability regret bound in which the martingale deviation term scales with the noise level $\sigma$ rather than the gradient bound $G$, yielding a multiplicative improvement of $G/\sigma$ over the classical Azuma-Hoeffding baseline. Our analysis introduces an exponential supermartingale argument that bypasses the bounded-difference requirement of Freedman's inequality, enabling direct treatment of unbounded sub-Gaussian noise without truncation artifacts. For bandit feedback, we prove a minimax lower bound: the high-probability regret scales linearly in $\log(1/\delta)$, in contrast to the $\sqrt{\log(1/\delta)}$ confidence cost under full information. This constitutes a formal separation in the confidence cost of strongly convex OCO across feedback models. Regarding constrained OCO with stochastic constraints satisfying a Slater condition, we provide simultaneous high-probability guarantees for both cumulative regret and long-run constraint violation, achieving $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{T\log(m/\delta)})$ regret and $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{T}/(\zeta\delta) + m\sqrt{T\log(m/\delta)})$ violation. Synthetic experiments corroborate all theoretical predictions.
Abstract:We study high-probability regret bounds for online convex optimization (OCO) with strongly convex losses and establish three results that resolve open questions at the intersection of noise adaptivity, feedback structure, and constraint satisfaction. For the full-information setting with sub-Gaussian stochastic gradients, we prove a noise-adaptive high-probability regret bound in which the martingale deviation term scales with the noise level $\sigma$ rather than the gradient bound $G$, yielding a multiplicative improvement of $G/\sigma$ over the classical Azuma-Hoeffding baseline. Our analysis introduces an exponential supermartingale argument that bypasses the bounded-difference requirement of Freedman's inequality, enabling direct treatment of unbounded sub-Gaussian noise without truncation artifacts. For bandit feedback, we prove a minimax lower bound: the high-probability regret scales linearly in $\log(1/\delta)$, in contrast to the $\sqrt{\log(1/\delta)}$ confidence cost under full information. This constitutes a formal separation in the confidence cost of strongly convex OCO across feedback models. Regarding constrained OCO with stochastic constraints satisfying a Slater condition, we provide simultaneous high-probability guarantees for both cumulative regret and long-run constraint violation, achieving $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{T\log(m/\delta)})$ regret and $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{T}/(\zeta\delta) + m\sqrt{T\log(m/\delta)})$ violation. Synthetic experiments corroborate all theoretical predictions.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2606.08028 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2606.08028v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.08028 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 275 words
Related coverage

Exploding variance of means of exponentials: least-squares to the rescue – Machine Learning Research Blog
francisbach.com · Sep 27, 2026

Humanity’s Last Invention — Richard Socher of Recursive
Latent Space · Sep 14, 2026
$\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ Regret and Polylogarithmic Constraint Violation for COCO
arXiv · Oct 6, 2026
Optimal Hidden-Target Learning for Online Inventory Optimization on General Convex Sets
arXiv · Jun 15, 2026