aiqbench analysis
This paper addresses a theoretical gap in caching algorithms by proving that existing hybrid LRU/LFU methods can suffer linear regret, then introducing H-MC to guarantee sublinear performance while managing switching costs. The work sits at the intersection of online learning theory and network architecture, offering rigorous mathematical bounds for memory management systems.
No-Regret Mixing of LRU and LFU with Optimal Switching Cost
arXiv:2609.07566v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Caching systems often rely on simple eviction policies such as Least Recently Used (LRU) and Least Frequently Used (LFU), which perform well in complementary request regimes. Recent policies such as LeCar and Cacheus combine LRU and LFU using ideas from the experts problem in online learning. Specifically, upon a miss, they randomize between the two eviction rules using probabilities derived from scores updated by tracking the history of past evictions. While these policies exhibit strong empirical performance, it remains unclear whether they are guaranteed, on every request sequence, to perform asymptotically as well as the better of LRU and LFU, i.e., whether they achieve sublinear regret with respect to this benchmark. We first show that LeCar suffers linear regret against an oblivious adversary, even with unbounded history. We then propose H-MC, a Hedge-based mixture of virtual LRU and LFU caches that preserves Hedge's selection probabilities, and hence its regret guarantees, while minimizing the switching cost among all joint selection rules with these marginals.
Abstract:Caching systems often rely on simple eviction policies such as Least Recently Used (LRU) and Least Frequently Used (LFU), which perform well in complementary request regimes. Recent policies such as LeCar and Cacheus combine LRU and LFU using ideas from the experts problem in online learning. Specifically, upon a miss, they randomize between the two eviction rules using probabilities derived from scores updated by tracking the history of past evictions. While these policies exhibit strong empirical performance, it remains unclear whether they are guaranteed, on every request sequence, to perform asymptotically as well as the better of LRU and LFU, i.e., whether they achieve sublinear regret with respect to this benchmark. We first show that LeCar suffers linear regret against an oblivious adversary, even with unbounded history. We then propose H-MC, a Hedge-based mixture of virtual LRU and LFU caches that preserves Hedge's selection probabilities, and hence its regret guarantees, while minimizing the switching cost among all joint selection rules with these marginals.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Networking and Internet Architecture (cs.NI)
arXiv:2609.07566 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.07566v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.07566 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 262 words
Related coverage
Dynamic Regret in Online Convex Optimization with Indicator Switching Costs
arXiv · Sep 28, 2026

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · Sep 17, 2026
When is a better LLM worth paying for? Stochastic Optimization with Switching Mixed-Fidelity Oracles
arXiv · Oct 17, 2026

Coherent (COHR) Q4 2026 Earnings Call Transcript
fool.com · Aug 20, 2026