aiqbench analysis
This research establishes fundamental limits on qubit-efficient compression for quantum optimization, demonstrating that reducing qubit counts inevitably shifts costs into stricter geometric constraints and smaller expectation value magnitudes. The study proves that non-Gaussian state resources cannot enhance the two-point relaxation bounds derived from quadratic-Majorana encodings, setting clear information-theoretic baselines for resource tradeoffs. These findings are critical for researchers developing scalable quantum algorithms who must balance variable compression against the fidelity of recovered solutions.
No Free Compression in Quantum Relaxations for Optimization
arXiv:2608.25151v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Qubit-efficient quantum relaxations compress classical decision variables into expectation values on substantially fewer qubits. We ask what resource tradeoffs this compression entails for quantum optimization. For the complete quadratic-Majorana encoding on $n$ qubits, pairwise correlators can represent $m=\Theta(n^2)$ binary variables. We define the universal margin as the smallest correlator magnitude that can be guaranteed with prescribed signs for every target sign assignment. We show that it is exactly $\Delta_{\rm Maj}(n)=\tan\!\left(\frac{\pi}{4n}\right)=\Theta(1/n)$, whereas uniformly random sign assignments retain $\Theta(1/\sqrt n)$ target-specific margins. The stronger $1/n$ worst-case scaling is Majorana-specific. Moreover, arbitrary density operators and fermionic Gaussian states generate the same quadratic-Majorana covariance body, so non-Gaussian state resources cannot enlarge this two-point relaxation. Beyond Majoranas, standard quantum random access code bounds provide general information-theoretic baselines. For any fixed family of $m$ designated binary observables on $n$ qubits, the universal margin is at most $\sqrt{(2\ln2\;n/m)}$, while arbitrary random access decoding from $N$ copies with constant success probability above $1/2$ requires $nN=\Omega(m)$. For a fixed Pauli correlation encoding required to work uniformly over all targets, maintaining a fixed nonzero decoded magnitude under smooth sign decoding therefore requires a rescaling parameter that grows as the available margin shrinks. Thus, while providing substantial qubit savings, compression can shift cost into restricted expectation value geometry, smaller expectation value magnitudes, or more demanding information recovery rather than eliminate it.
Abstract:Qubit-efficient quantum relaxations compress classical decision variables into expectation values on substantially fewer qubits. We ask what resource tradeoffs this compression entails for quantum optimization. For the complete quadratic-Majorana encoding on $n$ qubits, pairwise correlators can represent $m=\Theta(n^2)$ binary variables. We define the universal margin as the smallest correlator magnitude that can be guaranteed with prescribed signs for every target sign assignment. We show that it is exactly $\Delta_{\rm Maj}(n)=\tan\!\left(\frac{\pi}{4n}\right)=\Theta(1/n)$, whereas uniformly random sign assignments retain $\Theta(1/\sqrt n)$ target-specific margins. The stronger $1/n$ worst-case scaling is Majorana-specific. Moreover, arbitrary density operators and fermionic Gaussian states generate the same quadratic-Majorana covariance body, so non-Gaussian state resources cannot enlarge this two-point relaxation. Beyond Majoranas, standard quantum random access code bounds provide general information-theoretic baselines. For any fixed family of $m$ designated binary observables on $n$ qubits, the universal margin is at most $\sqrt{(2\ln2\;n/m)}$, while arbitrary random access decoding from $N$ copies with constant success probability above $1/2$ requires $nN=\Omega(m)$. For a fixed Pauli correlation encoding required to work uniformly over all targets, maintaining a fixed nonzero decoded magnitude under smooth sign decoding therefore requires a rescaling parameter that grows as the available margin shrinks. Thus, while providing substantial qubit savings, compression can shift cost into restricted expectation value geometry, smaller expectation value magnitudes, or more demanding information recovery rather than eliminate it.
arXiv:2608.25151 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2608.25151v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.25151 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 311 words
Related coverage

Researchers Define Hamiltonians and Reveal Inconsistencies in Quantum Optimisation Methods
Quantum Zeitgeist · Jun 10, 2026
Complexity Amplification from Compression in Quantum Random Access Optimization
arXiv · Sep 9, 2026

Quantum Max d-Cut via qudit swap operators
Quantum Journal · Sep 3, 2026
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · Oct 17, 2026