Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research investigates how Large Language Models adopt behavioral patterns from previous sessions during model swapping, revealing that raw history transfer significantly influences recipient reasoning while summarization can mitigate weak-to-strong bias. The authors propose DASH, a summarization technique that selectively preserves high-quality behaviors to optimize multi-model orchestration without incurring unnecessary inference costs. These findings offer critical insights for building robust agent systems that maintain continuity and performance across dynamic model deployments.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

New Model, Old Habits: Behavior Transfer under Model Swapping in Multi-Session LLM Agents

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.19712v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-session agents can switch between LLMs to balance performance and inference cost. Such switches require transferring a history for continuity, yet their effects on the recipient remain underexplored. Through controlled experiments with multi-session tasks, we uncover behavior transfer: recipients tend to adopt reasoning and action patterns from the models that generated their histories. This effect is most evident with raw-history transfer but is substantially reduced by summarization. Based on these findings, we propose Direction- and Authorship-aware Summarization of History (DASH) that preserves stronger-model behavior while minimizing weak-to-strong transfer via summarization. Experiments with repeated swaps show that DASH outperforms raw-history transfer and naive summarization baselines. These results suggest that effective multi-model orchestration requires considering not only which model to use, but also which behavioral patterns to carry forward.

Abstract:Multi-session agents can switch between LLMs to balance performance and inference cost. Such switches require transferring a history for continuity, yet their effects on the recipient remain underexplored. Through controlled experiments with multi-session tasks, we uncover behavior transfer: recipients tend to adopt reasoning and action patterns from the models that generated their histories. This effect is most evident with raw-history transfer but is substantially reduced by summarization. Based on these findings, we propose Direction- and Authorship-aware Summarization of History (DASH) that preserves stronger-model behavior while minimizing weak-to-strong transfer via summarization. Experiments with repeated swaps show that DASH outperforms raw-history transfer and naive summarization baselines. These results suggest that effective multi-model orchestration requires considering not only which model to use, but also which behavioral patterns to carry forward.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2610.19712 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.19712v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.19712 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 224 words

Related coverage