Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

NeurOWL introduces an end-to-end neuro-symbolic approach that combines Large Language Models with formal ontology semantics to address reasoning gaps in incomplete OWL knowledge bases. By unifying subsumption verification with abduction, the framework offers logically sound explanations for potential missing axioms without requiring predefined candidate sets. This advancement is significant for applications relying on robust semantic reasoning where data completeness cannot be guaranteed.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

NeurOWL: An LLM-Based Neural-symbolic Framework for Incomplete OWL Ontology Reasoning

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2607.15776v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: OWL ontologies provide a formal knowledge representation framework that enables semantic reasoning, and have been widely adopted across domains such as healthcare and bioinformatics. In practice, however, real-world ontologies are often incomplete, which pose challenges for reasoning. In this work, we focus on a fundamental subsumption reasoning problem: given an incomplete ontology and a candidate (non-entailed) subsumption, determine whether the subsumption is semantically plausible and, if so, providing a logically sound explanation containing potential missing axioms. This task unifies subsumption verification with ontology abduction, and generalizes the latter by removing the need for a predefined candidate set of missing axioms. To address this subsumption reasoning problem, we propose NeurOWL, an end-to-end neuro-symbolic framework that jointly performs verification and abduction, leveraging both formally defined semantics and textual semantics through Large Language Models and ontology embeddings. We evaluate NeurOWL on real-world ontologies across multiple domains, demonstrating strong and robust performance across different domains.

Abstract:OWL ontologies provide a formal knowledge representation framework that enables semantic reasoning, and have been widely adopted across domains such as healthcare and bioinformatics. In practice, however, real-world ontologies are often incomplete, which pose challenges for reasoning. In this work, we focus on a fundamental subsumption reasoning problem: given an incomplete ontology and a candidate (non-entailed) subsumption, determine whether the subsumption is semantically plausible and, if so, providing a logically sound explanation containing potential missing axioms. This task unifies subsumption verification with ontology abduction, and generalizes the latter by removing the need for a predefined candidate set of missing axioms. To address this subsumption reasoning problem, we propose NeurOWL, an end-to-end neuro-symbolic framework that jointly performs verification and abduction, leveraging both formally defined semantics and textual semantics through Large Language Models and ontology embeddings. We evaluate NeurOWL on real-world ontologies across multiple domains, demonstrating strong and robust performance across different domains.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2607.15776 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2607.15776v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.15776 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 245 words

Related coverage