Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces NeVI-Cut, a novel method for propagating parameter uncertainty in Bayesian workflows without requiring access to upstream data or models. By utilizing conditional normalizing flows and establishing theoretical convergence rates, the approach significantly reduces computational costs compared to nested MCMC while maintaining accuracy. The work advances variational inference by providing the first uniform Kullback-Leibler approximation rates for common flow classes, offering a robust solution for complex downstream analyses.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Neural Variational Cut Posteriors without Upstream Data

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2510.10268v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In many applications, one must propagate parameter uncertainty from an earlier (upstream) analysis, available as samples, to subsequent (downstream) analyses without feedback. This problem is called cutting feedback or cut-Bayes, and the cut-posterior, the optimal posterior preserving information-flow constraints, is well characterized. However, sampling from it (e.g., via nested MCMC) is computationally intensive, while existing variational inference methods for cut-Bayes require access to upstream data and model, often unavailable. We propose a modular and provably accurate cut-Bayes approach requiring no access to upstream data or model. We leverage the characterization of the cut-posterior as the minimizer of the expected downstream conditional Kullback-Leibler divergence over the upstream posterior, replacing the expectation with the sample average over upstream draws. Our method, NeVI-Cut (neural variational inference for cut-Bayes), employs conditional normalizing flows as the variational family for downstream parameters. We provide fixed-data convergence rates of NeVI-Cut in terms of the richness of neural architecture and complexity of the cut-posterior. We establish, to our knowledge, first results on uniform Kullback-Leibler approximation rates of conditional distributions by common flow classes, yielding widely applicable fixed-data error rates for variational flows. A stochastic algorithm implements NeVI-Cut efficiently, and we demonstrate its speed and accuracy on multiple applications.

Abstract:In many applications, one must propagate parameter uncertainty from an earlier (upstream) analysis, available as samples, to subsequent (downstream) analyses without feedback. This problem is called cutting feedback or cut-Bayes, and the cut-posterior, the optimal posterior preserving information-flow constraints, is well characterized. However, sampling from it (e.g., via nested MCMC) is computationally intensive, while existing variational inference methods for cut-Bayes require access to upstream data and model, often unavailable. We propose a modular and provably accurate cut-Bayes approach requiring no access to upstream data or model. We leverage the characterization of the cut-posterior as the minimizer of the expected downstream conditional Kullback-Leibler divergence over the upstream posterior, replacing the expectation with the sample average over upstream draws. Our method, NeVI-Cut (neural variational inference for cut-Bayes), employs conditional normalizing flows as the variational family for downstream parameters. We provide fixed-data convergence rates of NeVI-Cut in terms of the richness of neural architecture and complexity of the cut-posterior. We establish, to our knowledge, first results on uniform Kullback-Leibler approximation rates of conditional distributions by common flow classes, yielding widely applicable fixed-data error rates for variational flows. A stochastic algorithm implements NeVI-Cut efficiently, and we demonstrate its speed and accuracy on multiple applications.

Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Methodology (stat.ME)

arXiv:2510.10268 [stat.ML]

(or arXiv:2510.10268v3 [stat.ML] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.10268 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 297 words

Related coverage