Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research demonstrates how Graph Neural Networks can leverage network topology from social platforms like Telegram to detect unreliable news domains, achieving significant accuracy gains even when direct content analysis is unavailable. By exploiting assortative mixing patterns where low-reliability sources cluster together, the study offers a robust method for identifying misinformation that mimics credible journalism or evades generative AI filters.
Sources coveringarXiv, Latent Space, InfoQ
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Network Information Enhances Unreliable News Domain Detection

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.02399v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Content-based detection of unreliable news is increasingly difficult, as low-reliability sources mimic credible journalism and generative AI makes fabricated content harder to flag. We ask whether network structure can improve news reliability classification, taking a domain-level approach that shifts the focus from individual articles to source reliability. From URL-sharing patterns in Telegram chats, we build a statistically validated domain co-sharing network and find assortative mixing by reliability: low-reliability domains group together, as do reliable ones. Exploiting this structure, we compare Graph Neural Networks against network-unaware baselines using both content-aware features (multilingual text embeddings) and content-agnostic features (spreading dynamics). GNNs consistently outperform Multi-Layer Perceptrons on identical features, with GraphSAGE best in both settings (accuracy 0.63 with content, 0.53 without), a 13-14% relative gain over the network-unaware baseline. Network topology thus systematically improves domain reliability assessment, and remains effective even when content analysis is infeasible.

Abstract:Content-based detection of unreliable news is increasingly difficult, as low-reliability sources mimic credible journalism and generative AI makes fabricated content harder to flag. We ask whether network structure can improve news reliability classification, taking a domain-level approach that shifts the focus from individual articles to source reliability. From URL-sharing patterns in Telegram chats, we build a statistically validated domain co-sharing network and find assortative mixing by reliability: low-reliability domains group together, as do reliable ones. Exploiting this structure, we compare Graph Neural Networks against network-unaware baselines using both content-aware features (multilingual text embeddings) and content-agnostic features (spreading dynamics). GNNs consistently outperform Multi-Layer Perceptrons on identical features, with GraphSAGE best in both settings (accuracy 0.63 with content, 0.53 without), a 13-14% relative gain over the network-unaware baseline. Network topology thus systematically improves domain reliability assessment, and remains effective even when content analysis is infeasible.

Social and Information Networks (cs.SI); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph)

arXiv:2608.02399 [cs.SI]

(or arXiv:2608.02399v1 [cs.SI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.02399 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 246 words

Related coverage