aiqbench analysis
This paper establishes nearly optimal bounds on the non-Clifford T-gate resources required for quantum state purification, a critical subroutine for error mitigation in fault-tolerant quantum computing. By proving tight upper and lower limits for symmetric-projection protocols, the work clarifies the fundamental cost scaling of coherence preservation against noise. These findings directly inform the architectural efficiency of future quantum processors aiming to maintain high-fidelity states over extended periods.
Nearly Optimal T-Count for Symmetry-Based Quantum State Purification
arXiv:2610.12098v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Protecting quantum information from noise is essential for reliable quantum computation and quantum memories. Quantum state purification addresses this challenge by processing multiple noisy copies of an unknown quantum state to produce an output state of higher fidelity. Here we establish nearly tight upper and lower bounds on the non-Clifford resources required to implement the symmetric-projection purification protocol. For $n$ copies of a $d$-dimensional system, we construct a Clifford+T circuit that block-encodes the symmetric projector with operator-norm error at most $\epsilon$ using $\widetilde{O}(n)$ T gates, where the tilde-$O$ notation suppresses polylogarithmic factors in $n$, $d$, and $1/\epsilon$. Conversely, using stabilizer nullity, we prove that any Clifford+T implementation of such a block encoding with error $\epsilon<\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{1-1/n}$ requires at least $2n-2$ T gates, even allowing arbitrary positive normalization and clean stabilizer ancillas. Taken together, these results establish the nearly optimal scaling of non-Clifford cost with the number of copies and uncover the fundamental resource requirements for coherent symmetry projection in quantum state purification.
Abstract:Protecting quantum information from noise is essential for reliable quantum computation and quantum memories. Quantum state purification addresses this challenge by processing multiple noisy copies of an unknown quantum state to produce an output state of higher fidelity. Here we establish nearly tight upper and lower bounds on the non-Clifford resources required to implement the symmetric-projection purification protocol. For $n$ copies of a $d$-dimensional system, we construct a Clifford+T circuit that block-encodes the symmetric projector with operator-norm error at most $\epsilon$ using $\widetilde{O}(n)$ T gates, where the tilde-$O$ notation suppresses polylogarithmic factors in $n$, $d$, and $1/\epsilon$. Conversely, using stabilizer nullity, we prove that any Clifford+T implementation of such a block encoding with error $\epsilon<\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{1-1/n}$ requires at least $2n-2$ T gates, even allowing arbitrary positive normalization and clean stabilizer ancillas. Taken together, these results establish the nearly optimal scaling of non-Clifford cost with the number of copies and uncover the fundamental resource requirements for coherent symmetry projection in quantum state purification.
arXiv:2610.12098 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2610.12098v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.12098 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 252 words
Related coverage

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 15, 2026

Noise-Directed Warm-Starting Boosts 100-Qubit Quantum Optimization
Quantum Zeitgeist · Jul 13, 2026

Non-Gaussian Noise Magnetometry Using Local Spin Qubits
Quantum Journal · Aug 27, 2026

The Companies Building Quantum Computing Chips in 2026
The Quantum Insider · Jun 5, 2026