aiqbench analysis
The paper tightens the quantum sample complexity for exactly learning Boolean functions with at most k nonzero Fourier coefficients, reaching a near-optimal Õ(k) bound that is independent of input length n. That improves the prior O(k^{3/2} log² k) result and shows a measurable quantum advantage over the Θ(nk) classical bound. The work is theoretical and uses only separate measurements of individual quantum examples, so it matters mainly for researchers in quantum learning theory and for anyone assessing when quantum data access helps learning tasks.
Nearly Optimal Quantum Sample Complexity of Learning Fourier-Sparse Boolean Functions
arXiv:2610.17648v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study the number of uniform quantum examples needed to exactly learn a Boolean function with at most $k$ nonzero Fourier coefficients. We give a learner with near-optimal $\widetilde{O}(k)$ sample complexity independent of the input length $n$. The learner uses only separate measurements of individual examples. This improves the previous $O(k^{3/2}\log^2 k)$ upper bound (Arunachalam, Chakraborty, Lee, Paraashar, and de Wolf, 2021). The main ingredient is a candidate set formed by symmetric differences of subsets from independent groups of Fourier samples. A multilinear majority polynomial combines unbiased random approximations into an accurate witness whose Fourier support lies in this set. Granularity then forces the set to contain the entire Fourier support, including subsets never directly sampled. For comparison, we derive the tight classical sample complexity $\Theta(nk)$ by combining known sparse-recovery and lower-bound results.
Abstract:We study the number of uniform quantum examples needed to exactly learn a Boolean function with at most $k$ nonzero Fourier coefficients. We give a learner with near-optimal $\widetilde{O}(k)$ sample complexity independent of the input length $n$. The learner uses only separate measurements of individual examples. This improves the previous $O(k^{3/2}\log^2 k)$ upper bound (Arunachalam, Chakraborty, Lee, Paraashar, and de Wolf, 2021). The main ingredient is a candidate set formed by symmetric differences of subsets from independent groups of Fourier samples. A multilinear majority polynomial combines unbiased random approximations into an accurate witness whose Fourier support lies in this set. Granularity then forces the set to contain the entire Fourier support, including subsets never directly sampled. For comparison, we derive the tight classical sample complexity $\Theta(nk)$ by combining known sparse-recovery and lower-bound results.
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Computational Complexity (cs.CC); Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS)
arXiv:2610.17648 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2610.17648v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.17648 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 235 words
Related coverage
Learning Sparse Quantum States
arXiv · Sep 14, 2026

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 15, 2026

A brief history of quantum vs classical computational advantage
Quantum Journal · Sep 1, 2026

PIRAMID: Progress and Plans
LessWrong · Jul 27, 2026