aiqbench analysis
This research advances matrix completion by demonstrating that Riemannian gradient descent and Gauss-Newton methods achieve sample complexity comparable to convex approaches, effectively closing the theoretical gap in nonconvex optimization guarantees. By employing multiscale residual initialization, the study ensures exact recovery with high probability while controlling spectral error and incoherence simultaneously. These findings offer significant implications for improving the efficiency and reliability of low-rank matrix reconstruction algorithms in machine learning applications.
Near-Optimal Nonconvex Matrix Completion
arXiv:2609.17048v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study nonconvex methods for matrix completion, the problem of recovering a low-rank matrix from a subset of its entries. Convex methods achieve sample complexity linear in the matrix dimension and the rank, up to logarithmic factors, whereas global guarantees for commonly used nonconvex methods require a higher polynomial dependence on the rank. We close this gap by analyzing Riemannian gradient descent (RGD) and Riemannian Gauss--Newton (RGN) methods. For an $n\times n$ matrix of rank $r$ with incoherence parameter $\mu$ and condition number $\kappa$, the two methods achieve exact recovery with high probability from $O(\mu nr\log n\log(n\kappa))$ and $O(\mu nr\log n\log(2\mu r\kappa))$ observations, respectively. The methods use a multiscale residual initialization, while the analysis simultaneously controls the spectral error and incoherence. The resulting RGD iterates converge linearly, whereas RGN eventually converges Q-quadratically.
Abstract:We study nonconvex methods for matrix completion, the problem of recovering a low-rank matrix from a subset of its entries. Convex methods achieve sample complexity linear in the matrix dimension and the rank, up to logarithmic factors, whereas global guarantees for commonly used nonconvex methods require a higher polynomial dependence on the rank. We close this gap by analyzing Riemannian gradient descent (RGD) and Riemannian Gauss--Newton (RGN) methods. For an $n\times n$ matrix of rank $r$ with incoherence parameter $\mu$ and condition number $\kappa$, the two methods achieve exact recovery with high probability from $O(\mu nr\log n\log(n\kappa))$ and $O(\mu nr\log n\log(2\mu r\kappa))$ observations, respectively. The methods use a multiscale residual initialization, while the analysis simultaneously controls the spectral error and incoherence. The resulting RGD iterates converge linearly, whereas RGN eventually converges Q-quadratically.
Numerical Analysis (math.NA); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.17048 [math.NA]
(or arXiv:2609.17048v1 [math.NA] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.17048 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 229 words
Related coverage
DI Series: Serving Kimi-K3 MXFP4 Wide-EP Disaggregated on AMD Instinct MI300X and MI325X
AMD · Oct 8, 2026
An Educational GEMM Ladder for Helios GPUs
AMD · Sep 14, 2026
A Deep Dive into LDS Optimizations on AMD Instinct MI450 GPUs
AMD · Aug 28, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jun 7, 2026