aiqbench analysis
This research establishes that near-optimal ground-state preparation in quantum simulation does not require controlled Hamiltonian evolution, achieving the same query complexity using only uncontrolled unitary access. By introducing the "spectral descent principle," the authors demonstrate that additional control capabilities offer no significant advantage beyond logarithmic factors for these fundamental tasks. This theoretical advance clarifies the minimal resource requirements for simulating quantum systems and optimizing state preparation protocols.
Near-Optimal Ground-State Preparation without Controlled Hamiltonian Evolutions
arXiv:2610.00520v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Ground-state preparation, energy estimation, and property estimation are fundamental tasks in quantum simulation. Existing ground-state preparation algorithms achieve near-optimal complexity using block encodings or controlled Hamiltonian evolution, raising a natural question: is controlled Hamiltonian evolution necessary, or can the same scaling be attained in the weaker access model that provides access to only uncontrolled Hamiltonian evolution? We resolve this question by giving two algorithms that access the input Hamiltonian $H$ only through queries to $U_H$ and its inverse $U_H^\dagger$, where $\|H\|\le\alpha_H$ and $\tau=\Theta(1/\alpha_H)$. Given an input state with ground-state weight at least $\eta$ and a spectral gap of $H$ of at least $\gamma$, our first algorithm uses fresh copies of the input state and requires $\widetilde O(\alpha_H/(\gamma\eta))$ queries to $U_H$ and $U_H^\dagger$, while our second algorithm uses coherent access to the input-state preparation unitary and its inverse to improve this complexity to $\widetilde O(\alpha_H/(\gamma\sqrt{\eta}))$. The latter bound matches the known lower bound up to logarithmic factors, showing that algorithms with additional access to controlled Hamiltonian evolution cannot improve the query complexity for ground-state preparation beyond logarithmic factors. Both algorithms are based on a simple mechanism that we call the spectral descent principle, in which the algorithm starts from the input state $|\psi\rangle$ and progressively descends through the energy spectrum, moving closer to the ground state until the desired fidelity is reached. We also extend this framework to ground-state property and energy estimation and give explicit complexity guarantees for both tasks.
Abstract:Ground-state preparation, energy estimation, and property estimation are fundamental tasks in quantum simulation. Existing ground-state preparation algorithms achieve near-optimal complexity using block encodings or controlled Hamiltonian evolution, raising a natural question: is controlled Hamiltonian evolution necessary, or can the same scaling be attained in the weaker access model that provides access to only uncontrolled Hamiltonian evolution? We resolve this question by giving two algorithms that access the input Hamiltonian $H$ only through queries to $U_H$ and its inverse $U_H^\dagger$, where $\|H\|\le\alpha_H$ and $\tau=\Theta(1/\alpha_H)$. Given an input state with ground-state weight at least $\eta$ and a spectral gap of $H$ of at least $\gamma$, our first algorithm uses fresh copies of the input state and requires $\widetilde O(\alpha_H/(\gamma\eta))$ queries to $U_H$ and $U_H^\dagger$, while our second algorithm uses coherent access to the input-state preparation unitary and its inverse to improve this complexity to $\widetilde O(\alpha_H/(\gamma\sqrt{\eta}))$. The latter bound matches the known lower bound up to logarithmic factors, showing that algorithms with additional access to controlled Hamiltonian evolution cannot improve the query complexity for ground-state preparation beyond logarithmic factors. Both algorithms are based on a simple mechanism that we call the spectral descent principle, in which the algorithm starts from the input state $|\psi\rangle$ and progressively descends through the energy spectrum, moving closer to the ground state until the desired fidelity is reached. We also extend this framework to ground-state property and energy estimation and give explicit complexity guarantees for both tasks.
The authors acknowledge the use of ChatGPT 5.6 and 6 for help with writing and reviewing the manuscript, including identifying technical errors and inconsistencies in earlier versions
arXiv:2610.00520 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2610.00520v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.00520 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 282 words
Related coverage

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026
Running Variational Quantum Eigensolver with Qiskit Aer on AMD Instinct
AMD · May 29, 2026

Multiple qubit copies speed up quantum state preparation
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 2, 2026
News Archive 2026
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026