Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This paper establishes a rigorous framework for autoformalization by separating ontology extraction from logical translation, addressing a critical gap in how LLMs convert natural language to First-Order Logic. By systematically reviewing datasets and evaluation metrics, it clarifies current limitations in benchmarking and semantic verification within the formal logic domain. The work provides essential direction for researchers aiming to improve the reliability of AI-generated mathematical proofs and logical systems.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Natural Language to First-Order Logic LLM-based Autoformalization

arXiv1 min read

arXiv:2610.12030v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have renewed interest in autoformalization. Yet, when First-Order Logic (FOL) is considered as the target formalism, the field still lacks a unified task formulation and a systematic survey. This paper addresses this gap: we first provide a principled definition for the FOL-autoformalization task by distinguishing Ontology Extraction from Logical Translation, showing how their conflation obscures (cross-study) evaluation; we review existing datasets, evaluation metrics, and LLM-based methods, including fine-tuning, prompting, and verification-based refinement; we identify open challenges in benchmarking, semantic evaluation, ontology-aware methods, and end-to-end applications.

Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) have renewed interest in autoformalization. Yet, when First-Order Logic (FOL) is considered as the target formalism, the field still lacks a unified task formulation and a systematic survey. This paper addresses this gap: we first provide a principled definition for the FOL-autoformalization task by distinguishing Ontology Extraction from Logical Translation, showing how their conflation obscures (cross-study) evaluation; we review existing datasets, evaluation metrics, and LLM-based methods, including fine-tuning, prompting, and verification-based refinement; we identify open challenges in benchmarking, semantic evaluation, ontology-aware methods, and end-to-end applications.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2610.12030 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.12030v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.12030 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 184 words

Related coverage